What are your thoughts on Social Network Censoring? Facebook and Twitter have both taken down a HUGE New York Post Story.

Is this illegal? Are they censoring the press? Is this an in kind contribution to the Biden campaign? Was it because the New York Post Story was about Hunter Biden's laptop contents, discovered after Hunter Biden dropped off his laptop for repair while drunk and failed to pick it up or pay for the repair?

Twitter has locked out the White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany, and she says they have [i]permanently [/i]locked out her account. Twitter has also locked out the entire Trump campaign account.

BOTH Facebook and Twitter have locked out the New York Post for daring to publish a story that exposes the depth of corruption discovered on Hunter Biden's laptop.

Today an FEC complaint was filed against Twitter and Facebook, regarding suppression of information and in kind contributions.

A SECOND and THIRD corroboration of the truth of the corruption exposed on this laptop have come forward. Hunter Biden's former business partner, who was JAILED while Hunter went free, has now donated 26,000 emails related to the Biden corruption issue, and Hunter Biden's PARTNER has now donated thousands of emails of her own.

The American people deserve to know ALL the facts...and corrupt social media outlets are hiding the facts. Why? WHAT is so shameful that it needs to be quickly hidden? Hmmm?

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

Frank52 · 70-79, M

Censorship? Can that happen on a privately run, commercial operation? The story seems to be available freely on other platforms. I think, China, Russia and North Korea are better examples of censorship where the Government make sure that the Dear Leader's voice is strong and opposition voices are clearly labelled as unpatriotic.

4meAndyou · F

@Frank52 I think that these media platforms have crossed an important line. They have now become publishers by editing content that conflicts with their personal bias, and by so doing, they have made in kind contributions to the Biden campaign...or so Congress will argue. These two sites have managed to stir up at least 3 Congressional committees by the actions.

Frank52 · 70-79, M

@4meAndyou I think that is the danger in a deeply divided debate (we've had them in the UK too) that any platform that tries to mediate views, fact check or anything other than allow things to lie unchallenged will be seen as 'for' or 'against' whichever side you're on.

4meAndyou · F

@Frank52 Quite true. If these huge social media monopolies were, in fact, simple private companies, Congress would have been justified in providing them with protection from lawsuits, (which they did). That is the crux of the matter.

However, if they change their status and become monopolies with the power of suppression of the news for political reasons on their sites, they are no longer entitled to such protection.