The democrats proud accomplishment

@kodiac Lol no.

@kodiac It's not legal, there is just no penalty for it, kinda like "peaceful protesting" is legal

@sunsporter1649 It's a felony, and in that age range registration is mandatory. As usual, you're fucking stupid.

@QuixoticSoul As usual, you can not read. Did your mask slide up over your eyes again?

@sunsporter1649 You haven't read anything on this topic aside from the title of this post lmao. Ignorant as a rock.

@QuixoticSoul It says reduced penalties my bad ,but still why ?Also says fighting for no offender status for them .Why is this even being considered?Couldn't have anything to do with the fact that Hollywood is the new neverland.

@kodiac Because the existing law was discriminatory - it dealt differently with straight people than it did with gays.

California doesn't have a romeo and Juliet clause - so a senior having sex with a sophomore is a felony. When it's hetero sex, it's a felony but the judge can decide whether the offender goes on the registry for life or not. When it's homo sex, the registration is mandatory. This new law makes the state treat homos like it treats the hets, leaving the registration up to the judge.

None of this applies to sex with 10 year olds, registration is mandatory in those circumstances, and this law doesn't change it. It come into play when the victim is 14+, the sex was consensual, and the age gap is not too large. And the judge can still put them on the registry anyway.

@QuixoticSoul 14 and you're ok with that?

@QuixoticSoul Figures you would be supporting perverts abusing children, you must live in california

@sunsporter1649 Your state has a special exemption for this situation, but you don't seem to be spazzing about it.

@kodiac No, the law says it does not apply to children under the age of 14.