Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

What do you think when you read things like this?

Israeli forces shot and detained a 16-year-old Palestinian boy on Wednesday night in the occupied West Bank and informed his family the next day that he was dead.

Late Wednesday night, three Palestinian teenagers approached a road used by Israeli settlers near the occupied West Bank village of Deir Abu Meshal, located northwest of Ramallah, seemingly to throw stones or Molotov cocktails, according to information collected by Defense for Children International - Palestine. Israeli forces in a nearby concealed position opened-fire with live ammunition injuring all three boys.

Mohammad Damer Hamdan Matar, 16, was shot and detained by Israeli forces. The other boys, aged 14 and 15 years old, sustained gunshot wounds to their lower bodies but were able to escape. The next day, August 20, Israeli authorities contacted Matar's family informing them that he had been killed, according to information collected by DCIP.

Matar's body has not yet been handed over to his family. His remains are currently held at Abu Kabir Forensic Medical Institute in Tel Aviv, according to Al Jazeera. The two injured boys are in stable condition in Ramallah-area hospitals, according to information collected by DCIP.

"International law requires that intentional lethal force be used only when absolutely unavoidable to protect life, and only when lesser means would be insufficient to apprehend a suspect," said Ayed Abu Eqtaish, Accountability Program director at Defense for Children International - Palestine. "Where individuals allegedly carry out a violent criminal act, they should be apprehended in accordance with international law and afforded due process of law."

Under international law, intentional lethal force is only justified in circumstances where a direct threat to life or of serious injury is present. However, investigations and evidence collected by DCIP regularly suggest that Israeli forces use lethal force against Palestinian children in circumstances that do not appear to be warranted and may amount to extrajudicial or wilful killings.

While it is unclear if Israeli authorities are withholding Matar's body, Israeli authorities have implemented a policy of confiscating and withholding Palestinian bodies in violation of international humanitarian law and international human rights law. For grieving families, the Israeli policy of confiscating and withholding Palestinian bodies amounts to collective punishment.

In September 2019, the Israeli Supreme Court approved the practice of confiscating human remains after several legal challenges to the policy. On November 27, 2019, Israeli Defense Minister Naftali Bennett ordered all bodies of Palestinians alleged to have attacked Israeli citizens or soldiers to be withheld and not returned to their families. Israel is the only country in the world with such a policy of confiscating human remains, according to Adalah.

Since 2018, DCIP has documented five cases, not including Matar's, where Israeli authorities confiscated and withheld children's bodies from family members. In two cases, the human remains were eventually released, but in the three other cases, the bodies remain in Israeli custody, withheld from their families.
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
International law has little to no effect on individual nations. There are major crimes throughout the world happening every day. So most nations pay little heed to international law.

This goes even as far as the USA where native Americans tried to stop the oil pipe through their lands. That oil pipeline invalidating both treaties with the US government as well as international law.

So what do I think about that one situation? I can only think it's no different than some of what is happening here today in the USA with kids being shot without any kind of weapons. I don't like that either.

Yet individuals can do nothing other than speak out against such injustices and attempt to bring people together to make changes that are more effective. This is a continuous ongoing situation. And this is what change is all about.

International law is truly of no consequence, now. And never will be until such laws can be enforced from outside any countries. And if no one picks up the fight it will only change for the worse. Yet change will happen no matter the case, good or bad.
MrAverage1965 · 61-69, M
I think it's disgraceful and an embarrassment to the whole human race.
nickir · M
While he's quoting international law, it seems that international law forbids blowing up school buses with kids on them. Or blowing up market places. Or patently false accusations. Or breaking treaties like Oslo before the ink is dry on them. It might also forbid shooting missiles into other countries by the 10s of thousands, ESPECIALLY during cease-fires & truces. Maybe some of those "atrocities" aren't really atrocities, when 1 side sends its kids out to do its fighting.
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
Its like the Israel Palestine conflict in microcosm.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
PhilDeep · 51-55, M
Atrocities are tragic, no matter who's perpetrating on whom. Don't often see such direct reports of Israel in this respect in the UK.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
YMITheWayIM · 46-50, M
Karma is a force to reckon with.
SW-User
Fuck the Israelis.
Deserthiker · 61-69, M
War is unfortunate.

 
Post Comment