Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Anyone else find the humor in Democrats calling Republicans nothing but racists and sexists

Yet that is exactly what Sen. Harris was picked for as the VP nominee?
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
Meamwhile, most SW Conservatives have beem hearting the 'Jo and the Ho' meme.

Its not wrong to call someone racist or sexist if they are being racist or sexist. Its allowed, if its the truth.

This isnt true of all Conservatives but its true of a lot in SW and I can't remember a single instance of soneone on the SW right calling this out. Maybe some on the right do but it must be rare.

Instead we get the 'anyone who disageees with you is a racist or sexist' narrative, like here. This gives cover for reactionary views.
Budwick · 70-79, M
@Burnley123 [quote]Its not wrong to call someone racist or sexist if they are being racist or sexist.[/quote]

Good, glad we have that cleared up.
Biden's plan to choose a woman of color id clearly racist AND sexist.

Every democrat with character [if there were such a thing] agrees with me on that!
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@Budwick She is the first woman of colour ever to be a VP candidate.

Anti racism and anti sexism means you need more old white men.
SW-User
@Budwick so by your logic, it is racist for anyone to be in a position of power if they are not white. I dare say that’s how you would like it
Budwick · 70-79, M
@SW-User By my logic, for Biden to specifically state that his VP choice must be a woman of color is both racist and sexist.
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@Budwick Poor white guys don't get enough.
Budwick · 70-79, M
@Burnley123 Biden ain't poor!
His son scammed enough to take care of the whole family!
graphite · 61-69, M
@Budwick That's why Democrats (and some Republicans) are so terrified of Trump. He's such a threat to the "public service" gravy train they're riding - getting rich while in office, along with their families.
Budwick · 70-79, M
@graphite I agree 100%
SW-User
@Budwick He did not state she would be a woman of colour; he stated that she would be a woman. Plus it was HIS choice. He did not make it a rule for others to follow.

Plus you haven't contradicted me when I said that, by your logic, it is sexist and racist to allow any women of colour into a position of power, have you...?
SW-User
@graphite Hahahaha! And Trump and his family haven't been doing exactly that???😂
Budwick · 70-79, M
@SW-User August 30th, 2019 - CNN reports on Biden saying -

"Whomever I pick, preferably it will be someone who was of color and/or a different gender."

Presumably when he said different gender, he meant a female.

July 2020 USA Today headline - "About that running mate: 72% of Democrats in USA TODAY poll say it's 'important' Biden pick woman of color"

Give it up Lenin - you don't know what you are talking about.
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@Budwick Trump is literallu here and now scamming the Americam govt to make his family richer!
SW-User
@Budwick "And/or" is the important thing he said there. That actually left him open to picking a male running mate of colour, or a white woman. Let's not forget the little word "preferably" as well.

Also, 72% of his potential supporters actively encourage him to pick a woman of colour. Would you ignore your base and say, "oh no I can't do that, because some angry white Republican trolls will decide it's sexist and racist"? Actually, don't answer that...
graphite · 61-69, M
@SW-User Trump was mega-rich long before he ever thought about running for public office. Unlike Dementia Joe and his son, making Big $$ in the Ukraine, etc, specifically off of Joe's public service. Hunter - serving on the board of some Ukraine energy company, with zilch experience in the energy field, while his VP dad is overseeing Ukraine relations. Nothing to see here, folks!
SW-User
@graphite That's funny, I thought he was bankrupt.. Also, he's no different to every other person who's run for President.

And I'm not going into the Biden Ukraine thing again, it's been debunked thoroughly. However, and here's the clincher, no-one, outside fringe conspiracy theorists like yourself, actually cares...
Budwick · 70-79, M
@Burnley123 Scamming the government, eh?
Of course you have examples, evidence, proof, right?

No, I didn't think so.

Now, Biden on the other hand had his boy Hunter working a scam in Ukraine and publicly announced how he got the prosecutor fired.
Budwick · 70-79, M
@SW-User [quote]Biden Ukraine thing again, it's been debunked thoroughly[/quote]

Debunked! Biden confessed publicly!
graphite · 61-69, M
@Budwick Trump wealth takes nosedive in office https://www.cnbc.com/2018/10/02/trump-forbes-400-spot-tumbles-as-net-worth-declines.html
SW-User
@Budwick Yes, but of course you don't care to know the reason why (spoiler alert: It wasn't to protect Hunter).

Plus, as I've already said, it should be clear even to you that no one actually gives a shit. If they did (and even if the allegations were true) he would either be tanking in the polls or he would have been dumped long before this stage. So suck it up! 😂
Budwick · 70-79, M
@SW-User [quote] it should be clear even to you that no one actually gives a shit.[/quote]

Obviously no democrats give a shit.
Yes, the polls - the almighty polls.
You would think you guys would have learned about polls in 2016.
SW-User
@Budwick I'm not a Democrat, and yes I know about the polls. And actually, believe it or not, the polls were almost right in 2016, well within the margin of error.
Budwick · 70-79, M
@SW-User [quote]I'm not a Democrat[/quote]
You're not even an American!
Denial of party affiliation = I'm running out of ammo!

[quote]believe it or not, the polls were almost right in 2016[/quote]

Almost right, eh?
SW-User
@Budwick Would you like me to explain why in words you would understand?

... ...

I didn’t think so.

Silence = I’m beaten