Wouldn’t be better of without the concept of nation ?
Just a question , no need for name calling or heated comment .
Top | Newest First | Oldest First
PicturesOfABetterTomorrow · 41-45, M
SteelHands · 61-69, M
No. That's a paradox because by elimination of any it implies a super nation then replaces them. Did I mention helno?
No. Hells to the no. It runs counter to every anthropological indicator. Humans are not suited to collective congruety and nobody that studies life in any depth would not know this is a terrible idea that's been attempted and failed many times.
No. Hells to the no. It runs counter to every anthropological indicator. Humans are not suited to collective congruety and nobody that studies life in any depth would not know this is a terrible idea that's been attempted and failed many times.
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
It's necessary right now. Eventually, it likely won't be.
eli1601 · 70-79, M
And replace with?