Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Here's Some Actual Reporting On Covid - Stuff You May Not Have Heard

[b]GOP governors are handling covid-19 better than Democrats, but you’d never know it from the news[/b]


Opinion by
Hugh Hewitt
Contributing columnist
Washington Post
July 28, 2020


Against the backdrop of countless news stories about the covid-19 pandemic, much of the coverage from elite media centers in New York and Washington can be boiled down to this theme: Republicans generally and President Trump specifically have done a horrible job managing the novel coronavirus while Democrats have fought valiantly to turn the tide where they hold power.

Headlines on this newspaper’s website this past weekend focused on Florida — “Coronavirus ravaged Florida, as Ron DeSantis sidelined scientists and followed Trump” — and imperiled Republicans in the Senate — “As pandemic limits scrutiny, GOP fears lesser-known Democratic candidates will steamroll to Senator majority.” (Florida became the state with the second-highest number of cases over the weekend, surpassing New York.)

The awful metrics of covid-19 deaths tell a different story, according to data kept current by Johns Hopkins University. New York has suffered 32,645 deaths; New Jersey 15,804; California 8,455; Illinois 7,608; Pennsylvania 7,131; and Michigan 6,405 fatalities. All of these states have Democratic governors.


Republicans hold statehouses in some big states and there the counts look like this: Florida has seen 5,931 deaths, Texas with 5,085 fatalities and Ohio with 3,344. Arizona, also with a GOP governor, has 3,304 dead. Thus, of the 10 states with the most fatalities, the six highest tolls are all in states with Democratic leadership. Republicans run the virus response in states ranked seventh through 10th in this grim lineup.


How often have you seen those harshest of facts? Instead, the headlines trumpet new cases, where California leads with 453,155 cases, Florida with 432,747, New York with 412,344 cases and Texas with 394,927. Case numbers follow population totals fairly closely, but Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) is pummeled by New York and Beltway media, while New York’s Andrew M. Cuomo (D) gets at least a pass and often praise.

Cable news networks follow their well-worn ruts toward predetermined story lines and familiar refrains. Some shows have embraced narratives that seem as repetitious as the playlists of “Top 40” radio stations of decades ago.

Coverage of the protests has become just as unbalanced. With protests raging in Portland for nearly two months — and Saturday night bringing violence to other cities such as Seattle and Austin — a great deal of attention has been trained on the president’s completely legal deployment of federal officers to a few cities to protect public property but not on who is creating the mayhem and, now, firing shots. The very popular Portland Moms linking arms is a favorite picture; far less is said (or photographed) on elite outlets about the shootings, arsons and lines of black-clad anarchists.

My critique of the coverage says nothing about the epidemiology of the disease. I believe that the virus’s relentless march has been fought in good faith by every elected representative; that states hit first have been hit hardest because the public was slow to hear the alarm raised first in the third week of January — on my radio show, among other outlets — and that the public is affected primarily by deeply embedded patterns of human proximity.

New York City is crisscrossed by jam-packed subways. Florida, Arizona and California are car states. Montana and Utah are wide open and, in most places, lightly populated; Chicago, Miami and Los Angeles are dense. And where populations are older and concentrated and impoverished, the toll has been highest. The pandemic is not political. It isn’t a Republican or a Democratic disease. Reopening of states led to spread. If the mass demonstrations around Memorial Day did not contribute to spread, it is hard for me to imagine that they reduced it. Trump hoped that summer’s heat would rout the virus and that has obviously not occurred. Few have all the right calls here; life generally cannot contain an invisible virus spread by asymptomatic carriers.
AD

But it would be easy to conclude from the coverage that Republican governors in Florida, Texas, and Arizona are uncommonly inept while their counterparts in New York, New Jersey, California and Illinois have been heroic and flawless.

We are interested in hearing about how the struggle to reopen amid the pandemic is affecting people's lives. Please tell us yours.

The numbers do not mean voters should support Republicans to end the virus. They certainly don’t suggest Democrats have found the magic formula for beating it. But it does suggest that news coverage has been anything but balanced, or even deserves the title “coverage.”

The pandemic has been politicized by Blue Check Twitter and the editors, producers, reporters and hosts who use it as their programming compass. The goal has been not to inform the public but to cudgel the president.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
JoeyFoxx · 51-55, M
I agree with many of the sentiments in this letter. But, it's conclusions are easily as biased and one sided as the behavior that the author is complaining about.

I think it's fair to say that both Democrats and Republicans have politicized this.

What the author fails to address are the objectively stupid and uniformed things that the President and many of his Republican followers have said that have helped to confuse people.

There have been Republican leaders who have contradicted the President numerous times, but they get conveniently ignored.

If the Republicans aren't politicizing this, then why haven't any of the ones in DC challenged the President re-tweeting a video of a doctor who believes that vaccines are made from alien DNA?
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@JoeyFoxx And why the fuck are we working with absolute numbers when you make an analysis like this?
JoeyFoxx · 51-55, M
@Kwek00 Let's also ignore the fact that there was an ENORMOUS lost opportunity for states to learn from the states that experienced the wave early. New York made some well documented mistakes, but addressed everything head on. (I really don't want to have an argument about the nursing home fiasco... I think that was a fuck up, but it's complicated)

There were a handful of Italian doctors that tried to warn the world and tried to share what they learned and address mistakes they made so that others wouldn't make those same mistakes.

Countries around the world listened.

The US President felt it was more important to preen for the camera.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@JoeyFoxx LOL, and just what were the goddamndemocrats focused on during December, January, February, and March?
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@sunsporter1649 Are you under the illusion that the goddamndemocrats are running the executive branch and the CDC Sporter?

The Goddamndemocrat that was in charge before 2016, said he made mistakes with the swineflu and created guidelines so that future presidents can learn from the mistakes. But this future president put those on the shelf because: "Whateva, I do what I want".

[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hjCHD41I7ok]
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@Kwek00 LOL, how'd that impeachment work out for you?
Budwick · 70-79, M
@Kwek00 [quote]Are you under the illusion that the goddamndemocrats are running the executive branch [/quote]

No, but the democrats are.
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@Budwick Replying that "the democrats are" has just reached a level stupidity that I didn't think we were able to cross. But I guess 2020 proves me wrong yet again. 😂
Budwick · 70-79, M
@Kwek00 [quote] a level stupidity that I didn't think we were able to cross.[/quote]

Not We KWeek Boy - the dems.
JoeyFoxx · 51-55, M
@Kwek00 I only wish there was a point and laugh reaction.
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@Budwick No Budwick, this triggered responds of anny criticism with "but the democrats" is really stupid in this conversation.

But I told you a couple of years ago, this is what happens when you are cheering for a team that is unable to handle anny criticism, can't reflect on it's own action and always pivots away by blaming other people.
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@JoeyFoxx It's like talking to a child that is unable to take responsibility on annything.
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
There is the virus and there is the CDC and other sciences. That is the total scope of what is going on, how it started and what is being done about it. @Kwek00 @JoeyFoxx
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@jackjjackson When the scientists asked to shut down the country, Trump went on national TV and said that the country wasn't build to be shut down. When the CDC asked people to wear a mouthmask, Trump went on national television and said that it was a recomendation but he wasn't going to do it. When they asked Trump about the high mortality rate on national TV, he asked Kayleigh to get the stats and then lied that the US was in the bracket of the best countries when it comes to mortality. When local people started organising and used the argument of "liberty" and "freedom" because the measures that needed to be taken to help to lower the curve, your president went to twitter and validated these protests even though the CDC and the scientists didn't support this opinion at all.

That's your leadership right there.
Budwick · 70-79, M
@Kwek00 I see.

I was responding to your joke BTW, not criticisms.

And, the word 'any' has one 'n'.

I'm impressed that you have catalogued your conversations with me.
That shows the kind of effort I would expect from a worthy opponent.
Please work on the quality of your content though - that kinds sucks.
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@Budwick I'm sorry I don't tell you how smart you are. But you have an American President for that, I don't get anny tax dollars from the US, so I'm not inclined to suck up to you people.
Budwick · 70-79, M
@Kwek00 [quote]I don't get anny tax dollars from the US, so I'm not inclined to suck up to you people.[/quote]

So, you can be bought.
To your mind, do you consider yourself to be
a whore or,
a prostitute?
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@Budwick Man, people tried to buy me in my carreer. Maybe you should ask them what the consequences were 😂. I don't think people consider me a whore or a prostitute.
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
I do. @Kwek00
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@jackjjackson But you have more problems then just that Jack 😅
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
Incorrect. I would include you in the whore/prostitute category. @Kwek00
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@jackjjackson That's okay Jack. I expect nothing else from people that make inteligent posts like this one:

https://similarworlds.com/18-Politics/3459259-The-Dems-coup-attempts-failed-so-now-they-are

People with that kinda mindset, as long as they stay out of my house, they can have their opinion where ever they want.
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
Also the truth. Anyone watching Nadler today that has a shred of integrity would admit they sa a doddering lying fool. Do you have a shred? @Kwek00
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@jackjjackson Don't know where the Nadler remark comes from... but what ever makes you happy tonight Jack. You go boy. 😂
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
So you have no shred of dignity. @Kwek00
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@jackjjackson I don't parrot propaganda around Jack. I still feel bad when I say things that are wrong. Maybe you can learn something from it.