Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Biden Says Police Have “Become the Enemy”

Joe Biden on Wednesday fully embraced the defund the police movement.

77-year-old Biden stumbled his way through an interview with health care activist Ady Barkan.

Biden went all in and caved to radical leftists like Ilhan Omar and AOC and said he “absolutely” supports taking away funding from police departments across the country.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Budwick must really be afraid Biden will win if he has to resort to making up things Biden has or hasn't said.
Budwick · 70-79, M
@independentone Trouble is - he DID.
@Budwick No, you took the statement out of context.
Budwick · 70-79, M
@independentone So put it into context - you have the technology - show us all how Biden actually loves appreciates and supports the police.
@Budwick It would do no good to explain it to you or give you the facts, you have already made up your mind, and your hatred of anyone to the left of the Birch Society, you consider your enemy.
Dominus · 31-35, M
@Budwick [quote]show us all how Biden actually loves appreciates and supports the police.[/quote]

I will. Then you can show us what Trump has done for police! (Being Trump never does anything except golf, Tweet and watch television you can just list what republicans have done for police) 🙂

https://www.congress.gov/bill/110th-congress/senate-bill/2565?q=%7B"search"%3A%5B"police"%2C"police"%5D%7D&s=2&r=2

https://www.congress.gov/bill/110th-congress/senate-bill/2237?q=%7B"search"%3A%5B"police"%2C"police"%5D%7D&s=2&r=4

https://www.congress.gov/bill/110th-congress/senate-bill/534?q=%7B"search"%3A%5B"police"%2C"police"%5D%7D&s=2&r=5

https://www.congress.gov/bill/110th-congress/senate-bill/449?q=%7B"search"%3A%5B"police"%2C"police"%5D%7D&s=2&r=6

https://www.congress.gov/bill/110th-congress/senate-bill/368?q=%7B"search"%3A%5B"police"%2C"police"%5D%7D&s=2&r=7

https://www.congress.gov/bill/109th-congress/senate-bill/2030?q=%7B"search"%3A%5B"police"%2C"police"%5D%7D&s=2&r=17

https://www.congress.gov/bill/109th-congress/senate-bill/718?q=%7B"search"%3A%5B"police"%2C"police"%5D%7D&s=2&r=20
Budwick · 70-79, M
@Dominus Trump is the president - he's federal, not state or local. However he did sign an executive order, Trump's executive order calls for the creation of a national database to track police misconduct. It also emphasizes the need for the increased involvement of mental-health professionals in policing to help deal with nonviolent situations involving issues such homelessness and addiction. Additionally, the executive order seeks to use federal grants to incentivize departments to reach certain standards on their use of force.

Granted it's more optics than substance, but again, he is federal - and he was primarily concerned with avoiding the demonization of police, which you and the left are bubbling over with hatred for police and Trump. His position does nothing for him personally - it's about supporting the safety of the American people. [I realize doing stuff for altruistic reasons may seem foreign to you - but it's what good and honest people do.
Dominus · 31-35, M
@Budwick Yes I know Trump is the president which is why I said the following and pay attention to what is in bold it is directly from the comment to which you replied.

[quote]I will. Then you can show us what Trump has done for police! (Being Trump never does anything except golf, Tweet and watch television [b]you can just list what republicans have done for police[/b])[/quote]

And [b]no[/b], Trump's executive order [b]does not[/b] [quote]calls for the creation of a national database to track police misconduct[/quote], it recommends it. Trump has no authority of state or local law enforcement.

[b]No[/b], the order [b]does not[/b] seek to use federal grants to incentivize departments to reach certain standards on their use of force.
Instead it threatens to withhold federal tax dollars from states that do not comply. Furthermore there is no system in place to verify compliance.

[I realize reading & comprehension may seem foreign to you but it's what's necessary to have any type of meaningful dialogue]

[b][u]THE EXECUTIVE ORDER[/u][/b]
https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-safe-policing-safe-communities/
Budwick · 70-79, M
@Dominus Yopu must have missed the part where I said [quote]Trump is the president - he's federal, not state or local. [/quote]

It Was the VERY FIRST SENTENCE - dumass
Dominus · 31-35, M
@Budwick LOL, you start your comment with [quote]"Yopu"[/quote] and and the same comment with [quote]"dumass"[/quote] I bet you feel like a dumbass?😂😂

And no I did not miss the part where you said "Trump is the President - he's federal, not state or local."([i]Guess who else is federal, the entire fucking congress you moron[/i]!)😂 I specifically acknowledged that when I wrote "Yes I know Trump is the president . . . [b]you can just list what republicans have done for police[/b] So get on with listing what republicans have done for police[b]?[/b](specifically)
Dominus · 31-35, M
@Budwick [quote]It Was the VERY FIRST SENTENCE - dumass
[/quote]

[b]Wrong AGAIN[/b]!

[u]This is the very first sentence:[/u] "[i]By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as follows:[/i]"

[u]This is the second sentence:[/u] "[i]Section 1. Purpose. As Americans, we believe that all persons are created equal and endowed with the inalienable rights to life and liberty.[/i]"

Be honest "Budwick," did you finish the 3rd grade?
Budwick · 70-79, M
@Dominus Why not quote the first sentence of [i]Alice in Wonderland[/i]?

You are a typical leftist.
Faced with truth, you divert, deflect, lie, anything to avoid honest conversation.

Either straighten up - or be alone.
Your choice.
Dominus · 31-35, M
@Budwick [quote]Why not quote the first sentence of Alice in Wonderland?[/quote]

Because we were talking about the presidents executive order, obviously. I am not certain you're literate much less capable of basic research. Or perhaps the republicans have not done anything for law enforcement.

I did know you were incapable of defending your ludicrous attack so my choice is a simple one. I choose to keep pounding you over the head with your fucking ignorance.
Budwick · 70-79, M
@Dominus [quote] we were talking about the presidents executive order[/quote]

Actually, the post is about Biden and his abandonment of police.
Dominus · 31-35, M
@Budwick Yet your comment; [quote]So put it into context - you have the technology - show us all how Biden actually loves appreciates and supports the police.
[/quote] resulted in my posting a links to ways in which Biden has supported the police.

Then I challenged you to show how Trump or any republican has. [quote]I will. Then you can show us what Trump has done for police! (Being Trump never does anything except golf, Tweet and watch television you can just list what republicans have done for police)[/quote]

Then you replied with; [quote]However he did sign an executive order, Trump's executive order calls for the creation of a national database to track police misconduct. It also emphasizes the need for the increased involvement of mental-health professionals in policing to help deal with nonviolent situations involving issues such homelessness and addiction. Additionally, [u][b]the executive order seeks to use federal grants to incentivize departments to reach certain standards on their use of force[/b][/u].[/quote]

Prompting me to reply: [quote]Wrong AGAIN!

This is the very first sentence: "By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as follows:"

This is the second sentence: "Section 1. Purpose. As Americans, we believe that all persons are created equal and endowed with the inalienable rights to life and liberty."[/quote]

You responded with a sarcastic attempted diversion: [quote]Why not quote the first sentence of Alice in Wonderland?[/quote]

Then I clarified for you: [quote]Because we were talking about the presidents executive order, obviously. I am not certain you're literate much less capable of basic research. Or perhaps the republicans have not done anything for law enforcement.[/quote]

Now you fall back on . . .[quote] Actually, the post is about Biden and his abandonment of police.[/quote]

You did so because you cannot name anything republicans have done for police. You were the one who issued to challenge to show what Biden has done for police. I did that and challenged you in turn to show what republicans have done for police. You have been spiraling out of control every since. LMAO! 😂😂🤣
Budwick · 70-79, M
@Dominus What post are you referring to?

Trump expresses appreciation for police all the time.
What else is he to do.

\The police work for the mayors - not him.
@Budwick Trump sure doesn't express much appreciation for the FBI. Why does Trump hate federal cops?
Dominus · 31-35, M
@Budwick [quote]What post are you referring to?

Trump expresses appreciation for police all the time.
What else is he to do.[/quote]

Well if I knew where you were I would write it out on a 2 by 4 and let you keep it at your bedside since you're incapable of comprehension.

FBI is federal, CIA is federal, DC Police are Federal. All of whom Trump has repeatedly attacked. I asked you what legislation have the republicans passed on behalf of law enforcement. You keep redirecting because your incapable of finding out and know nothing from memory. You are still an imbecile.