Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Americans Overwhelmingly Oppose Defunding the Police

We've also learned that 'Defunding the Police' means;
'Defunding the Police'. Initially, leftists led by BLM and antifa tried walking back the ridiculous concept saying stuff like 'We want to redirect funds from policing to other community resources like social workers.' Which of course is the same thing as 'Defunding the Police'.

Later it was discovered in the New York Times that 'Yes, We Mean Literally Abolish The Police', according to the author of the leftist policy, Mariame Kaba, a Soros alumnae.

Meanwhile, a list of demands have been written by the rioters. And, leftist leadership are actually considering negotiating with the terrorists holding Seattle hostage.

And, as one might expect, since the terrorists are being tolerated in Seattle, riots are exploding in other parts of the country. I suspect we'll see more capitulation by local democrats, more sections of cities taken over by terrorists, more sudden resignations of police and police chiefs, and more demands made by terrorists.

This no longer about George Whatshisname. It's about dismantling law and order, erasing America.

It's yet another unprecedented challenge for American people, for national leadership to unravel, repair. It becomes crystal clear that no one on the left is capable or even willing to take on the challenge, Thus far, their response is to negotiate surrender which is not an option.

President Trump is the ONLY one with the courage and stamina to take on this problem, to restore law and order and get back to the business of Making America Even Greater.

I look forward to hearing what you have to say.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
(((Soros)))!

Goddamn did that guy fuck the brains of you folks 🤣

Oh no, terrorists in Seattle!

Defunding police is stupid, imo - but you're also thoroughly misrepresenting people's various positions on that as well.
Budwick · 70-79, M
@QuixoticSoul Soros is YOUR friend, not mine.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
daisymay · 51-55, T
@Armelion He's a liberal. With money.

That is a major cognitive disconnect for them, since no liberals have money in their "reality".
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
@Armelion Soros generically donates to a left-leaning causes, most of them pretty benign. It's relatively easy to apply for and get a little money from his foundation if you're broadly liberal, especially if you align with their long-standing focus on transparency, multilateralism, etc.

This rather pedestrian reality drives a certain set of morons completely up the wall, and causes them to conjure up the most amazing shit.

When pressed for specifics, they never, ever have anything. Frankly I'd love for something to turn out true, juicy conspiracy shit is fun.

But it's always just nonsense.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Budwick · 70-79, M
@Armelion Don't expect to any reports on CNN.
daisymay · 51-55, T
@Budwick [quote]Don't expect to any reports on CNN.[/quote]

Are you having a stroke? Gee, I [i]sincerely[/i] hope not. Believe me.

At least try to make sense, moron.
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
@Budwick Of course, the fact that none of you geniuses are ever able to come up with any evidence or even a coherent theory is a CNN issue 😂

The other day some Hungarian dumbass around here tried to tell me that Soros erased Hungary's Communist-era debt via high interest personal loan in exchange for a line at vague "(my precioussssss) national treasures" and is now banned from entering the country.

Like holy shit man, he's obviously never even tried to look into any of it lmao - and the rest of you are no better.
Budwick · 70-79, M
@daisymay Hvae you seen any CNN reports about SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE AUTHORIZES SUBPOENAS FOR OBAMA OFFICIALS AMID RUSSIA PROBE REVIEW?

I didn't think so.
Budwick · 70-79, M
@QuixoticSoul THat's on ypou.
\Don't hang with Hungarian dumasses.
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
@Budwick As I said - none of you (((Soros)))-triggered weirdos have ever done any better.
daisymay · 51-55, T
@Budwick [quote]SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE AUTHORIZES SUBPOENAS FOR OBAMA OFFICIALS AMID RUSSIA PROBE REVIEW[/quote]

🤣

OMG, Trumpansies authorized someone to issue subpoenas for the political "enemies" of the Orange Moron Regime? Wow, this is in no way political theater designed to distract from Emperor Zero's incompetence and mental illnesses.

But, yeah, I have seen that headline. It never ceases to make me guffaw.

So, any other bullshit you need debunked?
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
@Budwick [quote]@daisymay Hvae you seen any CNN reports about SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE AUTHORIZES SUBPOENAS FOR OBAMA OFFICIALS AMID RUSSIA PROBE REVIEW?[/quote]
https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/11/politics/subpoenas-obama-officials-lindsey-graham/index.html

Bud you've been extra stupid lately. Chill.
daisymay · 51-55, T
@Budwick Wow, owned in fewer than five responses.

You really ought to be grateful that Quix even considered your idiocy enough to prove you wrong. I certainly don't rate you high enough to do that.
Budwick · 70-79, M
@QuixoticSoul Nice article.
Where's the corresponding broadcast piece?
[CNN realizes dems don't read]
Budwick · 70-79, M
@daisymay [quote]Quix even considered your idiocy enough to prove you wrong[/quote]

But, he didn't.
It's an article. You dopes don't read.
Where's the corresponding broadcast piece?
daisymay · 51-55, T
@BudwickDeflection noted. Dig up, stupid.
daisymay · 51-55, T
@Budwick [quote]Hvae you seen any CNN reports[/quote]

[quote]Where's the corresponding broadcast piece?[/quote]

Don't hurt yourself moving those goalposts, Bud. We wouldn't want you to be sidelined. Not at all.

Believe me.

[quote]You dopes don't read.[/quote]

Aww, someone is mad about the truth re: conservatives not having the reading comprehension skills of your average slug. A pity.

Cheer up, Bud. Your Russian masters will ensure 4 more years of the Moron in Chief. I'm sure he can get us to even lower depths of economic recession in that time.
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
@Budwick I don't own a TV, nor would I spend 24 hours glued to it like you apparently do - how else would you know if CNN never discussed the subpoenas on air?

[quote]You dopes don't read.[/quote]
Uh huh. You sure strike me as a real prolific reader bud.
Budwick · 70-79, M
@QuixoticSoul Well, you are literally one in a million!

[CNN viewers number about a million.]
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
@Budwick I am not a CNN viewer 🤷‍♂️
Budwick · 70-79, M
@QuixoticSoul That's what makes you,...
never mind. Over your head.
daisymay · 51-55, T
@Budwick Where did you put those goalposts this time?

You pathetic piece of shit.