Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

What changes should President Trump make to the US in his second term ?

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Budwick · 70-79, M
Prosecute the jag wipes involved with the coup attempt.

Encourage other republicans to put in their big boy pants and stand up against leftists and media.

Hold more Pro-America rallies.

Continue all other policies.
😂@Budwick
KaraLuvz · 46-50, T
@Budwick so in other words become more of a dictator
Budwick · 70-79, M
@KaraLuvz [quote]so in other words become more of a dictator[/quote]

Gosh, no! One of his primary duties is to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. Same with the FBI, DOJ and political bad actors involved with the coup attempt. The bad guys NEED to be prosecuted to the full extent of the law, so that justice might be served and discourage anyone from ever trying something like that again - against any president.

So, no, you're wrong, incredibly wrong.
KaraLuvz · 46-50, T
@Budwick since there was no coup then it would be political arrests and false prosecution therefore a dictatorship. You know like the ones Trump loves to praise on what a good job they are doing running their countries
Budwick · 70-79, M
@KaraLuvz [quote]since there was no coup then it would be political arrests and false prosecution therefore a dictatorship. [/quote]

So, give 'em a pass, 'boys will be boys', eh?
Just look the other way at their attempt to overturn the citizens that elected him to office,, practically ensuring that it will happen again and again. Never mind the turmoil the lies put the country through.

Andy - that is bad thinking on your part.
KaraLuvz · 46-50, T
@Budwick since they followed the law there is nothing you can do like I said no coup just like with nixon and Clinton there was no coup.
Budwick · 70-79, M
@KaraLuvz [quote]since they followed the law[/quote]

They did nothing but break laws!
KaraLuvz · 46-50, T
Name the laws they broke? @Budwick
Budwick · 70-79, M
@KaraLuvz [quote]Name the laws they broke?[/quote]

I'm sure many more will be revealed as the indictments are made, but one of the biggies would;


[b] 18 U.S. Code § 2385. Advocating overthrow of Government[/b]

Whoever knowingly or willfully advocates, abets, advises, or teaches the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying the government of the United States or the government of any State, Territory, District or Possession thereof, or the government of any political subdivision therein, by force or violence, or by the assassination of any officer of any such government; or

Whoever, with intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of any such government, prints, publishes, edits, issues, circulates, sells, distributes, or publicly displays any written or printed matter advocating, advising, or teaching the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying any government in the United States by force or violence, or attempts to do so; or

Whoever organizes or helps or attempts to organize any society, group, or assembly of persons who teach, advocate, or encourage the overthrow or destruction of any such government by force or violence; or becomes or is a member of, or affiliates with, any such society, group, or assembly of persons, knowing the purposes thereof—

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction.

If two or more persons conspire to commit any offense named in this section, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction.

As used in this section, the terms “organizes” and “organize”, with respect to any society, group, or assembly of persons, include the recruiting of new members, the forming of new units, and the regrouping or expansion of existing clubs, classes, and other units of such society, group, or assembly of persons.
KaraLuvz · 46-50, T
Valid method see congress’s right and job to impeach a president. You definitely would make a shitty lawyer. @Budwick
Budwick · 70-79, M
@KaraLuvz [quote]You definitely would make a shitty lawyer[/quote]

Good thing I don't pretend to be one.

Are you thinking that the House would go down that path again? After their embarrassing first attempt?

You would make a shitty - well probably lots of things.
KaraLuvz · 46-50, T
@Budwick but I’m obviously smarter than you on how things work in the government.
Budwick · 70-79, M
@KaraLuvz [quote]but I’m obviously smarter than you on how things work in the government.[/quote]

Obviously!
'Since the coup attempt failed - no crime!'
I bet you actually could get some knotheads in government to agree with you.

Silly me, I was talking about how law and order is supposed to work.
Not how to get around it.
KaraLuvz · 46-50, T
@Budwick there was no coup you jackass you just keep saying the same stupid shit and it continues to show your ignorance for facts
Budwick · 70-79, M
@KaraLuvz [quote]ontinues to show your ignorance for fact she[/quote]

Ignorance, for what again?
KaraLuvz · 46-50, T
If you check again I fixed it@Budwick
Budwick · 70-79, M
@KaraLuvz I agree the coup was not successful.
That's why I wrote 'coup ATTEMPT'.
Did you miss that?
Or, are you serious about thinking that since it was unsuccessful, there's no crime?
KaraLuvz · 46-50, T
It was never a coup. @Budwick
Budwick · 70-79, M
@KaraLuvz I see.
Since you know how government works and all, please reveal what you think that was.
KaraLuvz · 46-50, T
It was holding the president accountable just because republicans are so far up Trumps butt doesn’t mean it was a coup@Budwick
Budwick · 70-79, M
@KaraLuvz [quote]It was holding the president accountable [/quote]

Accountable for what?
They made up everything.
KaraLuvz · 46-50, T
Really they made it up even though it was admitted to on live tv. Wow @Budwick
@KaraLuvz Budwick had stated when Trump was first elected that he approved of Trump working closely with Putin. I'm not convinced Budwick is actually an American citizen, or a Russian plant. but if he is American born, he is a traitor.
KaraLuvz · 46-50, T
Budwick · 70-79, M
@KaraLuvz @independentone Mueller and his merry band of traitors won't be able to prove it - you know with actual evidence.

But, it's fun to make shit up, eh?