This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Harriet03 · 41-45, F
[image deleted]Not every country has a bullshit spouting leader, who puts it's citizens in mortal danger to try & save his own ass!!
You're welcome ✌
You're welcome ✌
RodionRomanovitch · 56-60, M
@JT123 'The US is on the low end of infected people globally ' ..... fourth actually , only behind China , Italy and Spain , and with an accelerating rate of infection now you have finally gotten round to testing people.
Defend Trump all you like , but don't expect us to swallow your lies the way you swallow his.
Defend Trump all you like , but don't expect us to swallow your lies the way you swallow his.
JT123 · M
@RodionRomanovitch Don't expect me to swallow the BS you people been swallowing for 3 years either
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@JT123 You know JT, what the most competent measures are at this moment, are pretty hard to evaluate in the middle of a crisis. If we approach the end of the tunnel we can look at diffrent measures and diffrent outcomes and see what was better then something else.
But when it comes to your supreme leaders communication, can't you at least admit that he was a bit stupid? You know in most european countries the signs started showing in early februari, and European leaders had the luxuary to already look at China who were the first to have a real problem. So European leaders could learn from China. The US could learn from Europe and China. Yet when people were dieing in Italy and things were highly exacelerating in Europe, and we already had the example of China. Your supreme leader was still talking as if nothing could touch the US? ... do you think that's a rational way of evaluating the situation?
But when it comes to your supreme leaders communication, can't you at least admit that he was a bit stupid? You know in most european countries the signs started showing in early februari, and European leaders had the luxuary to already look at China who were the first to have a real problem. So European leaders could learn from China. The US could learn from Europe and China. Yet when people were dieing in Italy and things were highly exacelerating in Europe, and we already had the example of China. Your supreme leader was still talking as if nothing could touch the US? ... do you think that's a rational way of evaluating the situation?