Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Why do I think we need to adopt a war economy?

This is UK context though it relates to elsewhere. By 'war economy' I mean sonething like the state interventionist model which Britain and others adopted in WW2.

Because of the virus, we are already entering a major recession. Society enters semi lockdown so that people will be spending less and spending on different things.

If you work in the public sector or in an industry which deals in essential services, then you should be ok. Likewise if your company does a lot of trade in deliveries.

This is not everyone though. Lots of people work in hospitality or in service sector industries where demand has just collapsed and will stay collapsed for a few months. These businesses are already going under or laying off staff. Altohgether, this is perhaps ten percent of the workforce.

It means huge government welfare payments from the government but still not enough for families to put food on the table. There is no way that the market can adapt overnight to fill these jobs at this time so their could be an unemployment crisis to compound the medical crisis.

Our government needs to do more direct investment in the economy. Denmark is guaranteeing the wages of 75% of private workers and even Trump's thousand dollar payment to US citizens is more than our government is doing. All they are doing for businesses is to give them loans. What use is a loae if you have no customers for four months?

We need to nationalise key industries to keep people in work. This also makes sense because the virus will stop us importing a lot of things we need. A good place to start would be for the government to convert factories to make ventilators which hospitals are despertely short of. Charities are really struggling at a time when we need them more than ever. This is also a placen where government can, and should, intervene to create jobs.

I think governments of the world will all be forced to transition to something like a war time economy anyway. My worry is that some will be doing it as a reactive, not proactive, way of coping with the crisis. We need to do this now, not in two months time.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
beckyromero · 36-40, F
We don't need to nationalise key industries to keep people in working

But we certaintly need key industries working at the behest of government.

Guaranteeing wages in the short term (many months) should be part of it.

[quote]A good place to start would be for the government to convert factories to make ventilators which hospitals are despertely short of. [/quote]

This should have been happening a month ago.
MarkPaul · 26-30, M
@beckyromero That's really the root cause of this massive failure and a preview of what will be the environmental crisis. Instead of preparing for the worst to limit dire impact, we wait until the very last minute and rely on crisis behaviour. Crisis management can certainly work, but when you have substandard leaders, the results are devastating. It reminds me of working on a class team where everyone else seems perfectly comfortable waiting to the last minute and pushing out whatever crap they can in a rush to meet the deadline.
beckyromero · 36-40, F
@MarkPaul

We, as a country, need to get our collective heads of the sand.

We spends tens of millions of dollars each year on studies and reports highlighting the dire consequences of inaction on any numbers of subjects. And then we do nothing.

[u]Example:[/u]
There were plenty of experts and some elected officials, like then-Sen. Mary Landrieu, who warned for years about the danger New Orleans faced if a storm surge from a hurricane hit Lake Pontchartrain.

Did anyone listen? No. Then Hurricane Katrina hit.
MarkPaul · 26-30, M
@beckyromero It feels as though we are fighting against human nature though. And, that's almost as formidable as Mother Nature.
beckyromero · 36-40, F
@MarkPaul

We never learn.