This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
calicuz · 56-60, M
No, I don't think they have enough evidence
1-25 of 68
ViciDraco · 41-45, M
@Ynotisay Republicans won't acknowledge evidence of wrong doing and when they can't ignore the evidence then they just claim it isn't wrong doing. Quid pro quo isn't quid pro quo if you say no quid pro quo.
He could have told people to take some guns to the bank and get the money, and then in another discussion said don't call it robbery,I don't want a robbery, and they'd claim he's innocent because he didn't want them to use the legally appropriate term.
He could have told people to take some guns to the bank and get the money, and then in another discussion said don't call it robbery,I don't want a robbery, and they'd claim he's innocent because he didn't want them to use the legally appropriate term.
Ynotisay · M
@ViciDraco I've got the Senate hearing playing in the background and the Republicans have been on that road all day. They're screaming and whining about the FISA program yet have stonewalled any attempts to fix what they're whining about. It's the same old song and dance which, unfortunately, appeals to those who are easily manipulated.
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
@calicuz Impeachment is the process of leveling charges.
And the senate is not in the business of clearing anyone of anything - even when they do not remove a president. For instance - Bill Clinton was not cleared of wrongdoing in ‘98. Well all know he did what he did.
And the senate is not in the business of clearing anyone of anything - even when they do not remove a president. For instance - Bill Clinton was not cleared of wrongdoing in ‘98. Well all know he did what he did.
bijouxbroussard · F
@QuixoticSoul Yeah, he received a consensual blow job. And lied about it to a grand jury whose right to even ask about it was questionable. She wasn’t a foreign leader, no one was seeking quid pro quo for any “services” and no national security issues were involved.
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
@bijouxbroussard He lied under oath, and was impeached for it.
The senate decided it wasn’t worth removing him over it. But nobody cleared him him of anything, we all know what he did.
The senate decided it wasn’t worth removing him over it. But nobody cleared him him of anything, we all know what he did.
bijouxbroussard · F
@QuixoticSoul Yes, I did say he lied. But why did the GOP feel the need to inquire about his private life ? Especially when they’d go on to elect someone accused by 16 women of non consensual encounters ?
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
@bijouxbroussard It turned out that their much-vaunted moral high ground was just a front 🤷♂️
Clinton was deposed in the Jones lawsuit. It wasn’t actually the republicans questioning him. Starr just got his hands on solid proof that he lied in that instance.
Clinton was deposed in the Jones lawsuit. It wasn’t actually the republicans questioning him. Starr just got his hands on solid proof that he lied in that instance.
hippyjoe1955 · 70-79, M
@QuixoticSoul What lie under oath? Curious.
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
@hippyjoe1955 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment_of_Bill_Clinton
hippyjoe1955 · 70-79, M
@QuixoticSoul So Trump should be impeached for Clinton's lie? It does not follow....
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
@hippyjoe1955 For fuck's sake hippie, follow the damn conversation.
hippyjoe1955 · 70-79, M
@QuixoticSoul As soon as you start making sense. You mentioned some lie and I asked you for specifics. You referred me to Clinton. Trump is not being impeached for lying.
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
@hippyjoe1955 Read the damn conversation lmao.
hippyjoe1955 · 70-79, M
@QuixoticSoul I am asking you to tell me the specific lie under oath that Trump told. If you can't do that then you are just blowing demoncrap smoke. BTW while you are at it you can explain why Trump is not being impeached for lying under oath.
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
@hippyjoe1955 Read. The. Fucking. Conversation.
Holy fucking shit dude. (hint, we are not discussing Trump)
Holy fucking shit dude. (hint, we are not discussing Trump)
hippyjoe1955 · 70-79, M
@QuixoticSoul So you can't remember? Strange. Did you know that Trump is not being impeached for lying under oath? Let that sink in for a week or two. I know you are a very slow learner.
ViciDraco · 41-45, M
@hippyjoe1955 He was talking about the Bill Clinton impeachment. Bill Clinton was impeached (brought charges against) for perjury (lying under oath) but the senate did not remove him from office (conviction).
Slow down and read the conversation before assuming every negative thing said is about your lord and savior Trump.
Slow down and read the conversation before assuming every negative thing said is about your lord and savior Trump.
hippyjoe1955 · 70-79, M
@ViciDraco I am asking him for clarification. If he is that muddled in his thinking he must be related to Nancy and Biden. Is that the demoncrap disease? Could be.
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
@hippyjoe1955 Goddamn that's a lot of stupid 🤦♂️
ViciDraco · 41-45, M
@hippyjoe1955 What did he need to clarify? It is all in the thread. Or is this just a troll attempt?
1-25 of 68