If Beto were to become president

@Sicarium me neither

@Sicarium you would allow yourself to be killed or thrown in jail because of a gun? Seems irrational

@JessJessYay Loaded, false framing is irrational. Try again with an honest question.

@Sicarium explain how that’s false framing? Try again when you’ve learned a new fallacy and erroneously apply it lol

@JessJessYay Nah, I'll pass. You're clearly just going to twist anything I say to suit your ideological extremism and I'm just not interested in wasting the time.

@Sicarium haha what a world. Strong and macho verbally enough to supposedly stand up to the US government, but cower to a commenter on social media 😂

@JessJessYay If by... ...you mean "ignoring a bad faith troll's nonsense," yes.

I've seen your other comments. You're just another lunatic leftist. Nothing new, nothing intelligent, nothing worthwhile. You'll stick to the script, nothing more.

@Sicarium right back at ya. You’ll just regurgitate Sean Hannity’s talking points for the week. Until Breibart tells you what to think next.

@JessJessYay I'm actually not a fan of Sean Hannity. But whatever makes you feel better about being a bad faith NPC.

@Sicarium Pretty soon she will commend you for your skills at "caricature shilling". She is a classic predictable leftist.

@puck61 The constant moral posturing and sticking to script does get old with these people.

@Sicarium is “sticking to script” something you say to make yourself feel better? Or is it just a form of projection? You act as if you’re not repeating talking points from the right. Everything you’ve said I’ve heard a million times from countless other right wing trolls. Your lack of originality and independent thought is laughable, and concerning.

@JessJessYay That's nice. Dishonest, but nice.

@JessJessYay More projection??? Your user name should be "Epson"!

@Sicarium there it is again. You’re attacking the angle of the argument, rather than giving a credible or substantive rebuttal. You’ll just deflect and say “bad faith, dishonest, talking point” without ever getting into substance.

@JessJessYay You: "I demand you give a credible and substantive rebuttal to my ad hominems!"

Me: "Lol, no."

If you wanted subtance, your every reply wouldn't be some lame personal attack or twisting what was previously said. Just stop. Your dishonesty is cliched and transparent at this point.

@Sicarium I don’t think you know what an ad hominem is.
Is that like calling someone a “leftist” or a “lunatic” or a “troll” ?

@JessJessYay Well, we can add hypocrite to the growing list of your negative displayed attributes. Go back and read the comments again, tell me who resorted to ad hominems first.

Don't whine when you get your own attitude back. Stop being a shitty person and just be honest instead. It's not that difficult.

@Sicarium ahh but now you’re assuming I’m whining when in fact you are the one who is apparently butt hurt over name calling and ad hominem. I said nothing about them, until you brought it up. You can’t be a hypocrite when you never complained about the act the begin with 😂
I don’t rely on old tropes of offense and deflection. You can call me a shitty hypocrite until you run out of oxygen, doesn’t bother me. But YOU seem to have an issue with it. And then you assumed I did as well.
Just like you’re assuming I’m whining, when it’s just you creating this in your own head to make yourself think you’ve made a valid argument.

@JessJessYay Cool story.