This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
I thought I posted on this the other day-but the U.S. has had troops in Saudi Arabia for years.

SW-User
@soar2newhighs That’s still bad. I mean, why would the U.S. continue to support a country who’s responsible for 9/11, who also supports terrorism that the U.S. is still fighting?
I guess the same or similar reason why when the 9/11 report came out, many pages regarding the Saudi involvement were redacted. Money, oil, geopolitical sway has much to do with nations who go to bed with each other. And to this day I do not see where the country of Saudi Arabia, or Egypt, Lebanon or the UAE have formally by the United States, nor the U.N., been held responsible, though it's said a number of those aboard the aircraft that crashed into the towers, was brought down over Shanksville and hit the Pentagon were Saudis. But there were non Saudis...Mohammad Atta, Egyptian, and others from the UAE and Lebanon.@SW-User
Oh, I forgot...there are insurgent groups, factions such as Al Queda, ISIS who would enjoy overtaking Saudi Arabia, and as you know there's a proxy war going on between the Saudis and Iran, with Yemen caught in the middle. Iran backs the Houthis, and the Saudis with the massive amount of arms our past and current Administrations have given them in arms deals, use that against their adversaries, currently the Houthis. Hey, and don't forget, the past Administration also backed Islamic radicals, aka "moderate" (no such animal exists in a jihad)rebels fighting Assad and his regime. It's definitely not black & white or clear cut.@SW-User

