This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
DunDunDun · 22-25, F
both good and bad would come from it, idk if overall it would be good to do it or not, probably best not to tho
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
@DunDunDun What the hell sort of nonsense is this lmao 😂
Bombing ourselves is also apparently good 🤷♂️
Bombing ourselves is also apparently good 🤷♂️
DunDunDun · 22-25, F
@QuixoticSoul I guess the point of you saying, "Bombing ourselves is also apparently good 🤷♂️" is to say, "You wouldn't want that to happen" or something but uh, no. If I had the option to cause every living thing on earth to die painlessly and end all suffering then I would, no hesitation. It's a good thing for people to die. But because killing everything isn't much of an option, suffering comes with others dying, so that's why I said there's good and bad to it. Like I said, overall I don't think bombing random places would be good, but lets not act like no good comes from people dying at all.
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
@DunDunDun No, that was a reference to the "lowering population" thing.
DunDunDun · 22-25, F
@QuixoticSoul I get that but my point is it does apply everywhere. Lowering the population is a good thing, doesn't matter to me who's getting killed.