This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
jomsim · 26-30, M
When someone's committed a crime, you generally don't arrest the witnesses.
HoraceGreenley · 56-60, M
@jomsim yes,he did
JT123 · M
@jomsim He was informed in 2014 that Russia was trying to interfere in our elections but said nothing! Why? Because he was certain it was working in Hillary's favor! Regardless though, as president it was his duty to report interference from a foreign government and I want to know why he didn't! Let's not do a 1/2 assed investigation! His reporting this would have prevented this 2 1/2 year waste of my money
jomsim · 26-30, M
@JT123 But from a comment by another poster, the suggestion is that he approached the Russians specifically so that the Democrats would lose. With two such different stories, I don't see how both can be true and it now feels that perhaps neither is true and there is a lot of disinformation here.
jomsim · 26-30, M
@JT123 So now we're saying they met with Russia to rig the election [b][u]against[/u][/b] themselves and then told everyone about Russian collusion because they were angry that Russia rigged an election against them (which is what they asked for) - and they publicised it even though they were the ones who had colluded with Russians?
This is becoming less credible by the minute. Just step back and think about it for a second. It's entirely implausible.
This is becoming less credible by the minute. Just step back and think about it for a second. It's entirely implausible.
SevIsPamprinYouAlways · 56-60, F
[image deleted]@JT123
SevIsPamprinYouAlways · 56-60, F