Can someone tell me why ILLEGAL immigrants SHOULDN'T be removed?

@RemovedUsername679448 then why when trump said he would flood the sanctuary cities people turned against that idea.

@RemovedUsername679448Yeah...why not actually read about the problems cause instead of repeating talking points?

https://fraudscrookscriminals.com/2019/01/03/somali-crime-from-from-maine-to-minnesota/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CUL2EoUpmHs

@winchesterbros I would be scared if my city was “flooded” with Japanese tourists or bicycles of bunnys. US is a vast country. There is no need to flood any community with anyone. However, if you want to put fear in peoples hearts or create devision, this is exactly what you would say. And it has worked. Trump looks dumb but he has read Min Kampf and he is using the same tactics.

lol he's not hitler.

@winchesterbros The actual response was mostly eye rolling, with a few “let them come”s and some “stop using people for political gain”.

Btw - those would be legal residents with work permits you silly man, not even illegals 😂

They used to just release them in El Paso. Think back to how Trump was quite eager to describe how safe and nice El Paso is. Truth is, they simply disperse and head to where the jobs are. It doesn’t really matter where you release them.

@QuixoticSoul i know they wont stay in a sanctuary city. thats why i was against it. but many people were against the release of the immigrants into sanctuary cities. cher even blogged about it. my friend from philly was totally against it and he said many people were not happy about it.

@winchesterbros Omg Cher 😂

I repeat, those are LEGAL RESIDENTS, with work permits. Anyone bitching is probably overdosing on xenophobia - well, those types are everywhere.

@QuixoticSoul where does this idea that the people who are caught by ice are on work visas?

@winchesterbros Asylum seekers are released by ice with work permits while their case is pending - thus, for the duration they are legal residents.

You don’t think ice would just release illegals without changing their status, do you? They’d be obligated to immediately take them into custody again 😂

WASHINGTON — The Trump administration proposed a rule on Wednesday night intended to prevent undocumented immigrants from receiving federal housing assistance, the latest step in its efforts to ramp up enforcement of the nation’s immigration laws.

The proposal, according to an administration official, is intended to overturn what the official described as a Clinton-era loophole that allowed some undocumented immigrants to obtain public housing without revealing their citizenship status. The rule would ensure that the social safety net is awarded only to verified American citizens and legal residents.

The long waiting lists for public housing prompted the crackdown, the official said, adding that the rule would affect about 25,000 households.

@winchesterbros You probably meant to put that into the other comment chain.

But it’s the same stuff, really - the mixed household “loophole” that let legal residents in a mixed-status familes receive housing assistance (prorated to cover only eligible residents).

@QuixoticSoul nope its giving housing assistance to illegals by not asking for their citizen status.

@winchesterbros Well yeah, the mixed-status families had members that didn’t reveal their status and didn’t get assistance - that’s the “prorated to cover only eligible residents” part of the old system.

They are trying to take away assistance to US citizens that live in mixed-status families, you just can’t seem to see past the spin.

no you cant see past the spin. they werent asking for citizenship and were given assistance, thats whats now being cracked down on

@winchesterbros Only legal residents were give assistance - other members of the household were simply ignored.

Now they’re trying to make it so that the whole household cannot apply in the first place, even if some are eligible.

@winchesterbros Here is the NPR take:
But isn’t it funny how your article omits any mention of these details. That’s what I mean by spin.

no anyone was given assistance as they werent required to ask for citizenship or show proof. that was the loop hole

@winchesterbros Of course not. NPR is a good source, they’re not lying. Your source isn’t lying either - they’re just omitting.