Another way at looking at comparing today's political proponents to Nazis
Imagine Hitler said: "It's wrong to attack people based on religion, but only if their religion is christianity, islam, hinduism, sikhism, buddhism"
Random onlooker: "So basically, we can only attack Jews, but isn't that discrimation?"
Hitler: "No, because they have a disproportionate representations in positions of power, they got those positions unfairly because of who they are, and they oppress the rest of us victims"
Now, take your fringe leftist:
Fringe Leftist: "It's wrong to attack people based on religion, but only if their religion is judaism, islam, hinduism, sikhism, buddhism"
Random onlooker: "So basically, we can only attack Christians, but isn't that discrimination?"
fringe leftist: "No, because they have a disproportionate representations in positions of power, they got those positions unfairly because of who they are, and they oppress the rest of us who are victims"
Random onlooker: "So basically, we can only attack Jews, but isn't that discrimation?"
Hitler: "No, because they have a disproportionate representations in positions of power, they got those positions unfairly because of who they are, and they oppress the rest of us victims"
Now, take your fringe leftist:
Fringe Leftist: "It's wrong to attack people based on religion, but only if their religion is judaism, islam, hinduism, sikhism, buddhism"
Random onlooker: "So basically, we can only attack Christians, but isn't that discrimination?"
fringe leftist: "No, because they have a disproportionate representations in positions of power, they got those positions unfairly because of who they are, and they oppress the rest of us who are victims"
31-35, F
