What kind of person keeps repeating, "no collusion, no obstruction" to a massive degree even when the topic isn't brought up?

@Budwick Something tells me you listened ONLY to the summary of the summary from a Baby-trump minder and protector. Any weeping is being done by people who truly believe in morality and law and order.

Exonerated: No
Collusion: Yes

@Budwick No, it's anyone who still believes the AG should be beholden to the Constitution and not Trump...Have you actually seen the Mueller report and not just Barr's selective bullshit?

@MarkPaul I see.
You expect the meat and potatoes of the report to be different than his summary and summary?

@Budwick I "expected" the reverse, but am finding what you suggest.

@MarkPaul Look at the bright side.
It turns out the president is legit.
He's still obnoxious and rude - but you can trust him!

So, you got that going for you!

@Budwick [quote]You expect the meat and potatoes of the report to be different than his summary and summary?[/quote]


You know the phrase lying by omission? Compare and contrast what Barr said and what the report Mueller did.

@Budwick [quote]It turns out the president is legit.[/quote]


No it doesn't. It really doesn't.

@HerKing Well the summary was 4 pages and the report itself 400.

So, he lied 396 pages? Is that your contention?

@Budwick You must be brain dead. The actual report shows the Baby-trump lied about being exonerated, he lied about "no collusion," and he lied about "no obstruction of justice."

But, you go on believing someone who lies to you. I imagine the "Me Too Movement" will give you "some" cover for feeling like you can't leave your abuser.

Barr and Mueller and a team of people worked on the details to be released. This whole report was put together by an army of people. Mueller is by no means a fan of Trump. And doesn’t anybody think that if could have dug up ANYTHING to nail Trumps ass to the wall he would have? @Budwick

@Hikingguy [quote]And doesn’t anybody think that if could have dug up ANYTHING to nail Trumps ass to the wall he would have? [/quote]


Mueller says in the report that Trump cannot be exonerated because there was so much lying from the Trump camp it's impossible to assert what the truth is. Trump refused to be interviewed so that can't be used either.

@Budwick [quote]He's still obnoxious and rude - [b]but you can trust him[/b]![/quote]


Yeah, all those would be students who signed up to his university thought that...and the many many businesses and workers who have been ripped off by him for decades. No-one trusts him. He's a crook.

@Hikingguy [quote]doesn’t anybody think that if could have dug up ANYTHING to nail Trumps ass to the wall he would have?[/quote]

Yes, absolutely! And failing that, write his report in such a way so as to give MSM and dems something to attach hope to.

I understand the report sounds pretty damning UNTIL you get to the conclusion which says that everything written earlier was BS.

@Budwick[quote] [b]I understand the report sounds[/b] pretty damning UNTIL you get to the conclusion which says that everything written earlier was BS.
[/quote]

That's the difference between faith and fact. Have you heard any of it read out, straight from the Mueller report rather than Barr's Trump friendly BS?

@Budwick [quote]the conclusion which says that [/quote]


...because Trump's camp lied so much it was impossible to establish innocence or guilt...And Trump refused to be interviewed so his testimony wasn't there.

@HerKing In the report it says Trump's obstruction failed because others refused to 'carry out orders'. McGahn resigned because he refused to get the DAG to fire Mueller and Trump had told him to.

I started reading it but need to finish it later. I’ll be curious to read it to the end.@Budwick

@HerKing IS that a direct quote? 🤣

@Budwick Yes.

@HerKing So, the report reads somewhere -
"Mueller says in the report that Trump cannot be exonerated because there was so much lying from the Trump camp it's impossible to assert what the truth is. Trump refused to be interviewed so that can't be used either."

Do you know what direct quote means?

@Budwick Oh, I thought you meant this...


[quote]Trump's obstruction failed because others refused to 'carry out orders'. [/quote]


But the other thing I typed says that but in legal speak.

@Budwick https://media.npr.org/assets/news/2019/04/muellerreport.pdf

@HerKing And that's a quote too?
Or, are there walk backs and explanations to go with that one too?

I mean, if you're gonna bitch, at least do it clearly.