Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Would they?

North Korea should have said this....."You denuclearize and so will we.....deal???"

🙄😏🤣
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Mongoheadmonster · 41-45, M
So good for the goose but not the gander....ok 👌

Nukes are NKs ace in hole....nobody will do shit as long as he's got them and he knows it.
Sicarium · 46-50, M
@Mongoheadmonster You pro-nuclear weapons leftists crack me up.
Mongoheadmonster · 41-45, M
@Sicarium that your insult...call someone a leftist?? 🤣.

Think about it...US has bases and warships up beside NK...constantly watching him and 💪. How many military operations and bases does North Korea have next to the United States going on??? None!!! and you guys expect them to downgrade their military power.....then act all mad because he said get fucked.... 🤣🤣
Sicarium · 46-50, M
@Mongoheadmonster You're awfully sensitive.

How many bases and warships does NK have constantly watching SK? And what does either have to do with your support of nuclear weapons?
Mongoheadmonster · 41-45, M
@Sicarium my point is...you can't expect those guys to get rid of their nukes when you yourself has them...

And North Korea watching South Korea has fuck all to do with the US.....that's their business
Sicarium · 46-50, M
@Mongoheadmonster Why not?

And I love how a pro-nuclear Canadian is telling the US that they shouldn't get involved in someone else's business. The irony is glorious.
gol979 · 41-45, M
@Mongoheadmonster NK just want economic sanctions removed and for the Americans to demilitarize on their border. Perfectly reasonable requests
Mongoheadmonster · 41-45, M
@Sicarium holy Christ this is difficult 😐...you don't get what I'm trying to say.

I'm not pro nuclear weapons. And you're the hypocritical one...the fact that the UNITED STATES HAS NUCLEAR WEAPONS but has the audacity to demand that someone else gets rid of their nuclear weapons is the pinnacle of hypocrisy
gol979 · 41-45, M
@Sicarium you're basing your opinion of @Mongoheadmonster on the canadian government......you must be glad we don't do the same about you because the actions of your government are hideous
Sicarium · 46-50, M
@gol979 No I'm not, you're reading what you want to read. I'm basing my opinion on his own words.
Mongoheadmonster · 41-45, M
@gol979 this Trudeau retard is on the way out thank fuck!!
Sicarium · 46-50, M
@Mongoheadmonster Dunno, you seemed pretty giddy at the idea of NK with nukes.

And, wut? Lol. Transparent deflection alert. Canadian demands US gets out of others' business as Canadian gets into others' business.

There's a chance to negotiate at least a partial denuclearization and demilitarization on the NK/SK border. Apparently, you think that's a bad thing. I'm guessing it's just the Trump Derangement Syndrome at work. Since you oppose this, I can only assume that you are pro-nuclear proliferation.
gol979 · 41-45, M
@Sicarium not once has @Mongoheadmonster said he is pro nuke but you're basing that he is because Canada has nukes......it's ad hominem.

Do you disagree that NK asking for economic sanctions to.be lifted and America to demilitarise on their border is reasonable?
Mongoheadmonster · 41-45, M
@Sicarium the only reason ping pong has nukes in the first place is because the US is over there floating their fuckin boats around and flying their spy planes around and has bases right beside him like bigshots....Yankees like to start fires and complain about the smoke....you're world famous for it
Sicarium · 46-50, M
@gol979 [quote]not once has @Mongoheadmonster said he is pro nuke but you're basing that he is because Canada has nukes......it's ad hominem[/quote]

Lol, no I'm not. You keep putting words in mouth and I'm not sure why. But you're misunderstanding of my comments does not equal an ad hominem. Please read a dictionary. And Canada hasn't maintained nuclear weapons since 1984. So, you're basing your completely false interpretation of my comments on your own ignorance.

[quote]Do you disagree that NK asking for economic sanctions to.be lifted and America to demilitarise on their border is reasonable?[/quote]

I'd answer that, but you'd just misrepresent my answer anyway.
Sicarium · 46-50, M
@Mongoheadmonster Yes, yes, the US is bad and NK is a completely innocent snowflake on the world scene. They're just trying to live peacefully in their gulag utopia. They have in no way ever, not once, threatened a neighbor. They have posed absolutely no threat to South Korea. It's all just a US plot.
gol979 · 41-45, M
@Sicarium you're correct I have completely misread and misrepresented what you said.....apologies.

Interested to know what you think though
Sicarium · 46-50, M
@gol979 That's easy. There's a chance to negotiate at least a partial denuclearization and demilitarization on the NK/SK border.

Beyond that, it seem obvious to me that there's a large swath of people who are so caught up in their Trump-hate that, even though they would normally be in favor of denuclearization and demilitarization, they actively oppose anything Trump does. Embarrassing Trump is more important to them than denuclearization and demilitarization, not to mention actually helping anyone in NK achieve a better quality of life. Or, I'm wrong and these people, including @Mongoheadmonster, have been pro-nuclear proliferation all along. Those appear to be the only two options.
Mongoheadmonster · 41-45, M
@Sicarium well you certainly seem to be the ones who's mostly concerned about them...even though they haven't done anything to you guys.....maybe Dennis Rodman should go shoot some hoops with him before the next meeting
Sicarium · 46-50, M
@Mongoheadmonster You're the one that started the thread, twice. But I'm the one who's "mostly concerned with them." Lawl, OK. Anything to deflect from the real issue, I guess.
gol979 · 41-45, M
@Sicarium I agree that certain people cannot give trumpkins credit where it's due (ie moving troops out of Syria, on the surface at least)......the US and nk had agreed to.those terms before but a new president got in and tore it all up.......I'm pretty sure it was busy jnr. So it's not virgin ground.

I'm no trumpkins fan but this Russian collusion bullshit is going to explode in the people that are pushing this narrative, faces.

I have had discussions about this with people who believe it (it's their prerogative and I understand why) but they get just as angry as rabid right wingers when you disagree
Mongoheadmonster · 41-45, M
@Sicarium I just said what if he asked the States to drop their nuclear program too....

That would be out of the question.....that's my point
Sicarium · 46-50, M
@Mongoheadmonster Do you not get how negotiations work? And are you really that incapable of seeing any kind of middle ground? Or is this just really a case of your hatred for Trump driving you to hope the negotiations break down?
Mongoheadmonster · 41-45, M
@Sicarium doesn't matter what president is in the white house....Trump, Obama, or Daffy Duck
Sicarium · 46-50, M
@Mongoheadmonster Yeah, I seriously doubt that. Regardless, it's been fun. Maybe you should decide where your priorities are and go from there. Trump and US hate aren't going to get you anywhere except trapped in fundamentally hypocritical mental loops.
Mongoheadmonster · 41-45, M
It would be good if a deal was made....the NKs said what Trump said isn't true, that they weren't asking for a 100% lift on sanctions....so what's going on then??? Who's full of shit... Probably both are half full of shit