Hmmm. Interesting.

@gol979 xD

@gol979 Based on [b]what[/b] ? His word doesn’t mean much.

@TheCensoredBrot fair enough but it was a load of garbage from the start......in fact it makes it much harder for any progressive politicians and policies to find a way through because the msm has been pushing this narrative and good people have ruin with......hence having their credentials tarnished, shortly

@gol979 xD

@bijouxbroussard I'm not basing it on what trumpkins says, he is a pathological/political liar.

The Senate intelligence committee have so far uncovered no evidence of that collusion. Chairman of the committee, senator Richard burr said "it we write a report based upon the facts that we have, then we don't have anything that would suggest there was collusion by the trump campaign and russia"

There's more if you want it. Trumpkins is an odious character but don't give him a free pass and make his supporters more entrenched by believing this. Use the same critical thinking you/we use when criticising trumpkins

@gol979 Burr also said in an Oct. 3, 2016 interview ; “I have yet to see anything that would lead me to believe Russia was interfering to benefit Trump." - this despite the fact that from Aug. 11 to Sept. 6, 2016, the C.I.A. organized “a series of urgent, individual briefings for [the] eight top members of Congress.” The C.I.A. informed Burr and the others that the U.S. intelligence community had discovered the Kremlin was working to help elect Trump and that “unnamed advisers to Mr. Trump might be working with the Russians.” - https://www.justsecurity.org/62573/richard-burr-leadership-senates-russia-investigation-disintegrate/

Burr should have recused himself from the investigation once he joined the Trump campaign , but never did. He's just as compromised and unreliable as Devin Nunes was.

@RodionRomanovitch good point 👍