Bloody socialists.

@anythingoes477 Posted that screenshot already :D

@anythingoes477 😂😂 touche dude 👍

@gol979 As they cashed their Social Security checks that are funded by those that still work..........

@anythingoes477 and please don't mention fiscal multipliers attached to welfare

@gol979 Or Medicare...

@anythingoes477 what're are you on about......you'll bankrupt the country, look at VENEZUELA (always in capitals)

@gol979 I know. If we tax the rich we'll end up just like Venezuela. A FOX addict told me that.

@anythingoes477 I think they also added that the free market is "free" and trickle down economics is the best and only way.......this is becoming a circle jerk. Hoping someone interjects with some neoliberal economic bullshit

@gol979 Call Trump a future ex-con. You'll get lots of comments from the highly educated good old boy crowd.

@anythingoes477 I would but I don't think that myself

@gol979 Then you live in Wonderland. Between the 9th District Court holding 22 sexual abuse/rape sealed indictments...the House getting ready to hand out their own indictments and subpoena his taxes to dig even deeper into why Trump is so eager to go down on Putin everytime he sees his face...Mueller indicting more by the day, Civil Rico being used to make the #1 guilty of what he asked those working for him to do for him--Cohen, Manafort, Flynn and more....the 8th Eastern District Court holding the indictments handed down in New York State for state tax fraud charges for his charities, tax evasion, wire fraud, embezzlement.....and from the Federal IRS itself for tax evasion and charities violations....the investigations into MULTIPLE violations of the Emoluments Clause....missing/stolen/misspent funds from the Inauguration Committee to the tune of $65 to possibly $100+ million...the Russian/NRA scam to funnel/launder money from Russia to the GOP and specifically into Trump's campaign fund....money laundering with Russian mob money in several of his Trump Tower properties..........the list goes on and on. There are 17 separate state and federal agencies investigating Trump's criminal activities. Of him--his family--his legal teams at his behest...and his campaign. He could pardon himself from some--bribe his way out of a few more--but with over 40 felony charges and counting---not even counting in the sexual charges--sooner or later one or more will get him. The ONLY reason he is not already indicted on multiple counts is because of the "possible" legal question of whether a sitting prez can be indicted? That is why numerous time dependant indictments are being sealed..........so when he is out and can't pardon himself--then he can be charged and the statute of limitations won't have expired on his crimes. He's a dead man walking.......and so is 90% of those around him. The ONLY ones who don't know this are the ones that don't want to know. To the rest of the world that don't depend on the "sanitized" bullshit on FOX that they call "news" to make Trump look good--all of this is common knowledge.

@anythingoes477 purely in relation to the trumpkins campaign in collusion with Russia to win the election. The sexual assaults I wouldn't disagree but it's purely speculation

@gol979 "Collusion" is not a legal term. Trumpers always say there is no collusion..collusion is no crime. That is true. The crime is "conspiracy" and beyond all doubt Trump committed conspiracy to commit treason with a nation hostile to the interests of the United States the night he stood on a podium in front of 300 million people at the 3rd debate and openly asked that the Russian KGB--Russian intelligence--get involved in a national presidential election by finding dirt on an opponent and making sure that information got injected into our election for the purpose of throwing that election. That is the "collusion" that was committed. And since that was done--Russia DID hack email accounts in the United States---at Trump's request--- to find the emails Trump wanted and then used Wiki to make sure they got back to Trump and into our election. That is the other half of that equation. Russia was listening and they did indeed commit conspiracy with Trump to throw an election---just as he asked them to do. Turning it into word play of "collusion isn't a crime....so I'm innocent" is stupid. 300 million people witnessed what Trump and the Trumpers say never happened. So did the FBI.

@anythingoes477 dirt on clinton? You don't have to hack any emails to get that......just look at her public record.

I already popped this up earlier.......

The Senate intelligence committee have so far uncovered no evidence of that collusion. Chairman of the committee, senator Richard burr said "if we write a report based upon the facts that we have, then we don't have anything that would suggest there was collusion by the trump campaign and russia"

If you want I can give you the list of actions since he has been in office that are distinctly anti-russia?

@anythingoes477 I'm having deja vu. Have we discussed this before?

@gol979 I know......why not go back tell me again about what Bill Clinton did TWENTY SEVEN YEARS AGO. Boy that would be relevant. You all sound like jilted stalkers of a lover you just can't get past. Clinton is not--has not been and won't be indicted. FOR ANYTHING. The ultra right wing propaganda mills might stuff crap up your asses all day about how bad she is to keep you cranked up and ranting---to take your eyes off how truly bad this one is---but the fact is a TOTALLY GOP controlled congress has held 91 separate investigations over the term of 9 years into Hillary and Obama and found NOTHING. ZIP. ZERO. NADA. NOTHING to indict anyone for. You and the cult can tell us all day "what about this conspiracy theory" of today that Hannity tells you to rant about--------but the inconvenient fact for you all is she has never been charged with even one traffic ticket in 38 year of public service. And don't tell me its because no one has really tired to find the dirt on her. How many billions OF OUR TAX DOLLARS was spent just during the 8 Obama years on one investigation after another and all ended up with nada. Hannity wants to take your eyes off of what trump has done in just under 3 years. Facts may chap your ass to read it....but so far Trump investigations have landed him and his team in excess of 90 indictments in just under 3 years. One of two things are REALLY true here.......One....either the GOP are the most inept, stupid investigators to ever live on earth....or two......Hillary didn't do anything wrong to be indicted for. Which do you think it is?

@anythingoes477 calm down dude. I was talking about her political decisions. Clinton is a warmongerer and neoliberal psycho. Also, she gave 2 speeches to Goldman Sachs for $600,000 each. $1.2 million dollars.....she is on the side of the corporation's.

All when faced with new evidence you just go off on one, calling me a right wing etc.....rather than read what I wrote. I might point out that you aren't arguing with me you're arguing with the chair of the committee whom is investigating this.

@gol979 Question.......if you lost an election and someone was willing to pay you $600,000 or $1.2 mil for a speech...would you take it? That's what I thought.

@anythingoes477 this was prior to her losing an election. She is a corporate shill and a warmonger. You should hold all politicians to the same standard as you hold trumpkins.

You hold trumpkins in contempt, rightly so imo, but the democratic party has to take a large slice of blame for trumpkins winning the election, for how it has marketed itself and what it actually did during their terms in office

@gol979 Warmongering? Hmmm. Since you're obviously a VERY learned historian and political expert....who was president when the Vietnam War started? Eisenhower...REPUBLICAN. Who bombed Iraq to start that war? George Bush--REPUBLICAN. Who drug us into Afghanistan? Bush--REPUBLICAN.

Do us a favor genius---what was the war that warmongering Hillary Clinton started?

Corporate shill? Who passed the biggest tax cut ever in history that was aimed ONLY at helping Big Business? Reagan---REPUBLICAN. Who surpassed that bit of corporate welfare by passing a bigger tax cut yet to help no one but Big Business? Comrade Trump---REPUBLICAN.

Your heroes at Infowars and FOX have pumped you so full of lies and bullshit it's a wonder you can still walk. Go to a flea market if you don't care to pay full price and buy an actual history book. READ IT. Once you do that you won't have to come on places like this and try to bluff people with lies and bullshit and hope to god everyone reading it is as uniformed as you are.

@anythingoes477 ad hominem and a huge case of whataboutery. Seems to me, that in your world there's your version of the truth and anyone who disagrees is uneducated, falls for propaganda pumped out by fox and infowars, poor (can't afford a book). You're displaying all the hallmarks of a rabid right winger, the very thing you get super angry about.

Personally I think both the republican party and the democratic party serve corporate interests, there's barely a cigarette paper between them. It's clearly evidenced. Small caveat, the democratic party could be a beacon for progressives, there are some good voices making themselves heard but unless there's grassroots movement to change the infrastructure of the party it is going to be in majority control of the corporations.

You're suggesting that Clinton is a woman of the people and a voice for progressives. The evidence doesn't stack up to make that conclusion.

It really doesn't matter what I say but let's try. Libya was her "baby", you can look that up but if you want I can go into that (I doubt it though). Her rhetoric during the campaign was full on aggression in relation to Syria. There's many more examples of her being a corporate shill but seems like you're just as closed off as the people you claim to despise

I never said, "Clinton is a woman of the people and a voice for progressives." That our Russian puppet's tactic. Pull it out of your ass as a "fact" and hope to god someone believes it. We're done here.......

[image deleted]

@anythingoes477 you said she wasn't a war hawk, I just showed examples of her being exactly that. You don't refute any of my points or even discuss them, you just misinterpret my words in isolation to support your bias.

Then just quotation mark "fact" like you've given evidence of the opposite (which I would welcome) and say it's the tactics of the russians?

Then subtly and not so subtly insult me, then the good old "we're done here" and finish your rant with a meme. That is the modus operandi of the people you claim to despise.......in fact I have no idea what you're arguing for?