Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Does the world have it's political priorities wrong?

Maybe it's all about the taxes. Trickle-down economics has failed, even on its own terms. Billionaires meet at Davos to discuss 'creative solutions' which amount to nothing. Philanthropy can't fill the hole that low taxes dig and a rising tide leaves most people underwater.

In my view, Davos has one thing and one thing alone correct: the need for international collaboration. The rich collaborate and share their ideas at these summits and capital is international. To compensate for this, governments also need heavy international collaboration which includes collaboration on tax. Unless the effort to close tax havens is international, then money will just move elsewhere. French economist Thomas Piketty has previously suggested an international wealth tax (on assets, not income) and I think that makes a lot of sense.

This is why nationalism (of the right-wing populist variety) can never ever provide for its citizens as it claims. While it asks some of the necessary questions about 'globalist' free-market capitalism, it can never make good on its rhetoric of defending the ordinary people against the interests of wealth and power. It couldn't even do that if its figureheads did actually have that as a genuine objective, which they don't. Instead of prioritising our own countries (including the elites of your country) against others, we should be concentrating on building international solidarity.

Building a wall to keep people out won't stop capital from jumping the border. The Brexit version of taking back control means Ayn Rand island and 19th-century levels of regulations and protections. For me, the answers are simple but they are obscured by so much noise.

[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P8ijiLqfXP0]
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@kingkyri I agree with you but I don't think right-wing nationalism is the answer. It just replaces one form of elitism with another.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@kingkyri Yes I find them interesting. they are outright populist and I generally support them. Sometimes you need political representation though. You need a social movement and a political movement together to change anything.
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
Nationalism will never provide for its citizens because it only exists to protect a certain majority. They mainly engage in dog whistle politics, on the outside they make this pretty packaged version of society but low key, they are always decisive in let's say race relations, liberalism and LGBT issues.

You know minorities will suffer at the hands of a right wing Government. Look at what happens to gay people in other countries that have the same thing installed. Last time I checked, most of those countries are very right wing and very traditional.

To run an entire country means dealing with people you don't like, I have a feeling right wing nationalists are not up to the task.
eli1601 · 70-79, M
You can't get much more than 50% of the people in each country to agree on political issues. How many will agree to int'l collaboration.

Are you thinking socially as well as fiscally?
eli1601 · 70-79, M
@room101 Or maybe the person who won't cooperate is the smart one and can see the looming disaster everyone else is missing.
room101 · 51-55, M
@eli1601 Yes, because co-operating on matters which actually have a positive impact on the world at large is always so disastrous.
eli1601 · 70-79, M
@room101 Not always
im not comfortable at all with all the richest mother fuckers (unelected) gathering annually to discuss how they are going to move their money around to manipulate markets to get what they personally want..

say what you want about capitalism... it never killed millions by starvation..
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@TheOneyouwerewarnedabout Well, it did.

I really don't support the soviet union and here I'm kinda arguing for international social democracy.

I need to fact-check you on that though: capitalism killed many many millions of people during its industrial revolutions. That is before you even argue about attributing those who died during the wars fought by capitalist powers.
SmartKat · 56-60, F
Long but worth a read. Great analysis.
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@SmartKat Thank you.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@Bootsiebaby Grammar nazis will inherit the earth. 😜
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
This comment is hidden. Show Comment

 
Post Comment