We, the Democrat Party of the New World Order

We, the Democrat Party of the New World Order, in order to destroy all political opposition, insure the continuation of the Deep State, provide for the continual importation of alien nationals, promote the government dependence of the masses, and secure the continuance of the Democrat Party hierarchy and their offspring, do ordain and establish the continual opposition to the freedom of will of the People.

Article One

Section 1

The Democrat Party shall be composed of Members chosen every two years by the Officers of the Democrat Party of the various States, and these Electors in each State shall have the Qualifications requisite for Electors as determined by the Chairman of the Democrat Party.

Section 2

No Person shall be a Representative of the Democrat Party who has not attained the age of Sixteen, and been a citizen of the United States for less than Seventy-Two hours, and not having been an inhabitant of that State for less than Twenty-Four hours.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M

My my.. Someone has been Sneaking extra "Desperation Juice." Getting ready to secede from the Union over all the "lies" Cohen will tell the congress?? Maybe you could head for Mexico?? Someplace further South then. I hear Honduras is nice this time of year.

sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M

@whowasthatmaskedman Don't have to go to Honduras. If I wait a couple months they will all be here.

whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M

@sunsporter1649 And thats what the nice Orange man behind the curtain wants you to look at.

sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M

@whowasthatmaskedman I know, only 400,000 a year, nothing to see here, move along.

whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M

@sunsporter1649 That barely replaces the number of murders, drug deaths and road fatalities.

sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M

@whowasthatmaskedman So your proposal is to keep the borders open to replace those unfortunates instead of closing the borders to the illegals and using that money we currently pay to feed, clothe, and house the illegals to battle crime and highway safety? Whouda thunk it.

whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M

@sunsporter1649 Just making the point that the number is not important. Those people are human beings , most of whom are looking for a fresh start and a better life for their families. And Their lives matter as well. America was founded on that principle. If the people are now abandoning that, may I suggest you change your name.

sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M

@whowasthatmaskedman 400,000 is not significant. As long as they do not move into your neighborhood, of course. And we all know there is no means for legal immigration to the USA.

whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M

@sunsporter1649 Illegal immigration IS an issue. Having said that, its easily fixable IF the country REALLY wanted it fixed, by tightening up employment and housing laws. No wall required. But that would screw the cheap labour market. And throw thousands of border patrol and immigration people out of work.
But in reality, most migrants are an overall long term benefit to a country.They take up bottom rung jobs. and push their kids to do better. Those who break the law can have their residency forfeited.
None of this takes a wall.. And in the scheme of Americas problems, none of this is important.

sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M

@whowasthatmaskedman And how do you propose to separate the wheat from the chaff?

whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M

@sunsporter1649 Easy. Innocent until proven guilty. A conviction above a set point (maybe a felony would do it) and your residence is terminated. Deportation.

sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M

@whowasthatmaskedman Oh, I get it, everyone is allowed in, and can stay until they kill someone or some other detestable crime. I am sure Mrs. Ronil Singh would agree with that.

whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M

@sunsporter1649 I assumed we were actually having a sensible exchange. Of course you maintain the usual screenings. But on average, your native born population population will cause more real trouble. Even after you correct for socio-economic disadvantage. Of course, you cant claim that there is not be the odd person fall into that.

sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M

@whowasthatmaskedman Would it not be better to screen out the troublemakers before they get here? I heard that same crap from the democrats during the Viet Nam war, the serviceman we lost there would just have been killed in a traffic accident, so no big deal, move along, nothing to see here.

whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M

@sunsporter1649 I just agreed that normal screening should be in place. And I would not equate Miliatry casualties for any number reasons, including the fact that servicemen and women are a special breed (no matter what nation) and the willingness to stand up for you nation should never be cheapened or dishonoured.

sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M

And where do you propose screening them? In jail, after they have committed a crime? How about we screen them at the border, and prohibit entry to the country to the undesirables. We used to do that, you know, at places like Ellis Island. In fact, my mother arrived at Ellis Island, in August of 1939, from Poland.

whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M

@sunsporter1649 The crossing Checkpoints would work. Of course in my perfect world. Illegals would be demotivated by not being able to work, rent of buy property . or get a drivers licence or own a car.