This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Picklebobble2 · 56-60, M
Yeah. Just as i thought. Bull !
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_approval_rating
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_approval_rating
Budwick · 70-79, M
@Picklebobble2 Oh Pickle! You are too much! Wikipedia?
Picklebobble2 · 56-60, M
@Budwick If there were ANYTHING to suggest it was random or state wide or .....LOGICAL i'd buy it !
gol979 · 41-45, M
@Picklebobble2 beware of wikipedia
Picklebobble2 · 56-60, M
@gol979 Polls conducted by ANYONE on ONE persons/parties behalf have no value.
gol979 · 41-45, M
@Picklebobble2 of course, the bias is undeniable. I'm just saying, don't use Wikipedia as a definitive reference
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
@gol979 Wikipedia is fine, and that article is well sourced.
gol979 · 41-45, M
@QuixoticSoul it's ok on some things and you have to be super wary......check out Chris hedges on contact, about wikipedia. Also Craig murray. And there's and wiki editor called Phillip cross, might want to check him out too
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
@gol979 It's fine, and that article is well sourced. Nothing is completely free of bias, but at least the wiki's process is reasonably democratic.
gol979 · 41-45, M
@QuixoticSoul cool. Chris hedges interview may give you a slightly different slant on it
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
@gol979 Yes yes, tool of the ruling elite, etc. Meh. Also... RT.
gol979 · 41-45, M
@QuixoticSoul yes it is on rt but I wouldn't dismiss it because it's on Russian state tv. They have some excellent guests.....John pilger, no am chomsky, Mark curtis, Vanessa beesley, lowkey....voices you don't hear in other mainstream media. Obviously if you want a true reflection of the Russian state then avoid rt as it's obviously biased.
Same with wiki, use it but beware is all I'm saying.
Same with wiki, use it but beware is all I'm saying.