This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
HoraceGreenley · 61-69, M
@Burnley123 Hey man it's science!
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@HoraceGreenley When he posts a credible source, it might be science.
HoraceGreenley · 61-69, M
Harley4Life · M
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@Harley4Life I was expecting a source with evidence to back up your post, not a meme.
Okay, I'm kidding. 😆
You probably read about that on some crank website anyway.
Okay, I'm kidding. 😆
You probably read about that on some crank website anyway.
TheSeptikSkeptik · 46-50, M
@Burnley123 I'm looking for the study now. I'm curious as to what issues the left and right are categorized in and the sampling margins. This smells really off because the political spectrum of belief is so vast. What are the controls for such a study in the first place?
Harley4Life · M
@Burnley123 NY Post
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@Harley4Life OK. Can you post a link?
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@TheSeptikSkeptik Good questions and you'd have to ask Harley. There are lots of different studies on this. That I know.
TheSeptikSkeptik · 46-50, M
@HoraceGreenley How is the retraction interesting? The original study was flawed. What are you implying from that? Read the study. It has nothing to do with which political position is more correct or who is crazier.
TheSeptikSkeptik · 46-50, M
@Burnley123 Eyesnick's Psychoticism has nothing to do with mental illness. It's one of three possible personality traits from the P-E-N model of personality that was developed by Eyesnick, a psychologist. This entire study is being misconstrued to validate intellectually lazy people's beliefs.I found the NY post article he's referring to. All Harley had to do is read the article and it would have explained all of this to him. Psychosis and Eyesnick's Psychoticism are seemingly being conflated here.