What is wrong with GOP women?

@Harriet03 the thing about entitled guys like Kavanaugh is that the rules always apply to other people

@lorne13 Of course.

@Harriet03 👍

@Harriet03 Since you know what happened maybe we can save everyone the trouble, we can just put you before the senate and you can explain what happened that night 36 years ago since you know, you must know since you already condemned him.

@Johnson212 I'm just quoting, his own words.
What part of that, don't you understand??
Do your research, it's all there in the records.
Or don't you do facts?

@Harriet03 Yes it is a quote which implies he did something wrong as a teenager and should according to his own principles have lifelong responsibility for what he did. Again the problem is assuming that he did something wrong. And yes I do facts however you don't have a right to your own facts, the facts are the facts now what is popular in your circle.

@Johnson212 I agree.
So why not appear & answer?? If he's got nothing to hide.
Problem solved! No big deal.

@Harriet03 He is going to appear and answer on Thursday. If I don't have to go buy provable facts then I think it won't do any good when he appears because they have a list of false accusers that they are going to let out one at a time with the only goal being to postpone the hearing till after they hope to get a new congress after the election.

@Johnson212 That's just the first allegation, what about the second?

@Harriet03 Same thing, decades old, unproven accusations from Deborah Ramirez who was participating in a drinking game freshman year in college who was on the floor in a foggy drunk when Kavanaugh supposedly exposed himself and she touched his penis while pushing him away. She was reluctant to come forward because she could not remember. But after spending 6 days with her lawyer her memory suddenly became clear after 35 years.

Everyone Ramirez named as being present at the party denies it happened. Kavanaugh calls it “a smear, plain and simple.”

The New Yorker who brought out the story could not confirm Kavanaugh was at the party. Their article says "The New Yorker has not confirmed with other eye witnesses that Kavanaugh was present at the party."

Two male students at the party, a close friend of Ramirez, and three other classmates all say there's no way it happened. Four Yale graduates who are friends with both Kavanaugh and Ramirez said “with confidence” if the episode had ever occurred, they “would have seen or heard about it—and we did not.”
They add that it “would be completely out of character for Brett,” and the first Ramirez said anything about it was when Kavanaugh was nominated for the Supreme Court.

The New Yorker is well aware of the many problems with Ramirez's story.
Once again, this includes the fact it took Ramirez six days to try and cobble together her memory to conclude it was Kavanaugh.
She was consulting a Democratic lawyer during those six days. Ramirez also admits that there are “significant gaps in her memories”.
The New Yorker knows the allegation is very weak, but they ran the article anyway because they don't care. They just want Kavanaugh gone.

Democrats don't care if these stories are true because the accusation is the weapon.

That is what I think of the second accuser.