Gender equality is a joke. What do you think?

Let me explain before you start commenting stuff. If you didn't read the whole thing and you start commenting... I don't know. Ill reply with whatever. Anyways From what I see, It's not about giving women opportunity and a fair play, it's about treating them like hyped up blowup dolls who can do everything a man can do. So that means if the men are winning a fair competition in any category, succeeding more so to speak. It's a problem and we need to help these damsels to help feed their ego. Gender equality is basically just helping women to have more of an ego. More results to something they don't deserve.
Lets give an analogy:
There in existence is two people. Person A and Person B. We give both equal opportunity in this world of free will. We don't give a damn if they're A or B. Just do it correctly and you will get there. But then suddenly. Person A is complaining suddenly saying it's outrageous that Person B can do more work that's better and giving every excuse in the book and instead of trying harder to achieve those results like a genuine ethical person. They demand special privileges for themselves. Person A now has their own category. Now Person A and B no longer have equal opportunity. They have equal results though. Should we as people treat them equally then? I mean they both are in a position that we have to assume they reached fairly. But no they didn't. We all know Person A had short cuts because of the priviliges they demanded. We all know the true person who reached there through hard work and talent was Person B. Now you could say there are people like Person A who reached the heights of Person B but it's muddled by this now UNEQUAL opportunity that is unfair to Person B. I don't believe in giving you a reward because you gave me tears of pain. I don't believe in giving you in what you DON'T deserve because you're weak. I believe in giving to those who deserve it. Who tried hard and reached the sky and even farther. I'm sorry but that is not women. Not now at least. They are respected not because they're equal to men but because they are weaker than men. They use to be respected for the genuine work they did in the past. But now it's considered more of an insult than anything and we more value hard working women. But what is their to value if the only reason we value these women is because we feel bad for them. We feel bad so we have to help them. There are probably women who jumped through great heights to earn their position like judge judy for example. But its muddled by the mess we allowed. In order to give women a bigger ego. Men are awesome and so are women but this shit isn't equal. It's a mess and you expect everyone to agree with it and view a man who didn't need gender quotas, didn't need their genitals, didn't need a womans help. To get where they are now. NOW they have to lower themselves and give their hardwork to women in order to help them and the worst part is a lot of women have no respect for them, and think it's their fault. The past had gender roles for a reason! We didn't have the amount of technology, free time. To mess with our lives in order to experiment with genders. It was always easier for women and men to have specific roles to what they were GOOD at. Sorry not sorry.

Tatsumi · 31-35, M

Yeah. Like the female firefighter in New York who failed the firefighting test, but still got hired, because people were bitching about there not being enough female firefighters in the department. Then watch, if she dies on the job, there will be a shitstorm complaining about female deaths in the firefighting force.

It does revolve around the perception that women are delicate, idiot flowers who need handicaps to match up to domineering, intelligent, asshole men. That's the general belief system underlying feminism, along with gaining as much advantage as possible by creating problems that don't even exist, or blowing ones that do exist out of proportion. Because it needs inequality to survive.

It also revolves around reproduction and women being more important, biologically. An innate inequality. I.e. The concept of male disposability. But that won't be going anywhere for at least 20,000 years, until our instincts adapt. If they adapt. Basically.

Ironically as well, I looked up female happiness levels throughout the past century, out of curiosity. Western women have been more satisfied with their lives than men were in the past century, but that is starting to change. Female happiness has been dropping since the 70s. Ironically. though, they're still more content than men. For now.

You might like the book "The War On Boys", by Christinia Hoff Sommers. Particularly in education, this "help girls, 'cause they need it and boys suck" idea is steadily advancing women while leaving more and more boys by the wasteside. She predicted a lot of things today back in the 90s. Or just Christina Hoff Sommer's on youtube, going by "The Factual Feminist." I think she has a Ph.D. She's some kind of smartypants. Lotta interesting videos, basically revolving around pointing out facts and supporting that men and women have distinctive advantages and distinctive challenges, but we're on the same team.

Also, her quote, "No one will ever win the battle of the sexes. Too much fraternizing with the enemy." lul.