This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Lostsavage · 46-50, M
Read it. It says arms for the raising of militia. Kind of antiquated, then, and therefore open to interpretation. Since 1803 the supreme ct. Has interpreted the constitution however they please. Perhaps pipe bombs are illegal. I still know how to make one. Take my firearms, I'll build a catapult, etc. Etc.
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
@Lostsavage Well... build your catapult. Don't see anyone having a big problem with that.
Lostsavage · 46-50, M
@QuixoticSoul my point is that a person's right to defend their self is inherently natural regardless of how the government codifies it.
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
@Lostsavage That's fine. Defend yourself with catapults then.
I'm cranky the government won't let me import an armed MiG, personally. Now there is a real injustice, not your silly pea shooters.
I'm cranky the government won't let me import an armed MiG, personally. Now there is a real injustice, not your silly pea shooters.
Lostsavage · 46-50, M
@QuixoticSoul no kidding. I always wanted a tank... Fully armed, of course. Wouldn't be much fun otherwise.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment