Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Guns: Here is one writer’s idea. Can anyone disagree with this as a starting point?

Universal background checks. This means a National Instant Criminal Background Check for every buyer of every firearm. Last July, Pew Research Center found that 85 percent of Americans — 88 percent of Democrats and 79 percent of Republicans — favored making background checks mandatory for private gun sales and sales at gun shows. Those are Mom and Apple Pie numbers. An earlier poll by Frank Luntz found that a 74 percent majority of past and present NRA members favored expanded background checks.
Ban the bump stock used in Las Vegas. The bump stock turns a semiautomatic weapon into an automatic weapon, which already is banned. In a poll last year, a majority of registered voters wanted the device banned — 79 percent of Democrats and 68 percent of Republicans.
Deny guns to patients diagnosed mentally ill. A HuffPost/YouGov poll in 2014 showed that 54 percent to 23 percent of Americans wanted states to confiscate guns owned by people diagnosed with mental illness. There should be a review process to restore their rights after they recover.
Deny guns to suspected terrorists. Those on a watch list, who currently can buy guns, must be stopped. A method to restore rights must be included.
Age 21 to buy any gun. Under federal law, you must be 21 to buy a handgun. Raise to 21 the age to buy a rifle. It is lethal, too.
One gun purchase a month. That will slow the multiple straw purchaser illegally buying for someone not eligible to own.

http://www.philly.com/philly/columnists/stu_bykofsky/nra-second-amendment-australia-great-britain-6-gun-law-changes-stu-bykofsky-20180220.html

[image deleted]
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
katielass · F
That all sounds good and I don't disagree in theory. But when one considers the fact that less than 4% of the gun crimes in this country are committed by mentally ill people, is this going to solve the problem? Remember, we are talking about taking someone's constitutional rights away or suspending them. [b]also, once you've been on that list are you marked forever? Suppose you suffer from a mild case of depression and aren't a threat to yourself or anyone else. I'm sorry, it makes more sense to lock down all the doors to schools and have a couple armed guards at the one door. I'm far less concerned about the kids attending school in "that environment" than I am that they might go to school one day and not go home that night. I am in favour of finding solutions that do not infringe on people's constitutional rights. I can agree to not allowing raving lunatics to have guns but most mentally ill people are not raving lunatics.
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
It’s a start no
T the complete answer. So far there hadn’t even been a start. Seems to me that at least a start has a better chance of leading to a solution than doing nothing. @katielass
katielass · F
Suspending or revoking someone's constitutional rights is never a good place to start. There are so many other ideas that could and should be tried first.

Raise the age one has to be to buy a gun. If men under that age want to hunt they can go with someone over that age and use one of their guns.

Lockdown at all schools. Make one door the designated enter and leave door a]tat is protected y 2 armed guards. Install bullet proof glass on windows and doors.

Make it a mandatory life without parole for using a gun while committing any crime.

I mean if you are serious about stopping gun violence these are some places to start. And they have all been suggested before. But those who prefer to have the issue during election year and then forget about the problem the other years will probably still reject these ideas out of hand because it isn't the kids they are really concerned about, it's having something to sell at election time.
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
[image deleted]@katielass
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
If you skimmed the article it covers. OST of what you wrote WH in is why I posted it in the first place. @katielass