Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Guns: Here is one writer’s idea. Can anyone disagree with this as a starting point?

Universal background checks. This means a National Instant Criminal Background Check for every buyer of every firearm. Last July, Pew Research Center found that 85 percent of Americans — 88 percent of Democrats and 79 percent of Republicans — favored making background checks mandatory for private gun sales and sales at gun shows. Those are Mom and Apple Pie numbers. An earlier poll by Frank Luntz found that a 74 percent majority of past and present NRA members favored expanded background checks.
Ban the bump stock used in Las Vegas. The bump stock turns a semiautomatic weapon into an automatic weapon, which already is banned. In a poll last year, a majority of registered voters wanted the device banned — 79 percent of Democrats and 68 percent of Republicans.
Deny guns to patients diagnosed mentally ill. A HuffPost/YouGov poll in 2014 showed that 54 percent to 23 percent of Americans wanted states to confiscate guns owned by people diagnosed with mental illness. There should be a review process to restore their rights after they recover.
Deny guns to suspected terrorists. Those on a watch list, who currently can buy guns, must be stopped. A method to restore rights must be included.
Age 21 to buy any gun. Under federal law, you must be 21 to buy a handgun. Raise to 21 the age to buy a rifle. It is lethal, too.
One gun purchase a month. That will slow the multiple straw purchaser illegally buying for someone not eligible to own.

http://www.philly.com/philly/columnists/stu_bykofsky/nra-second-amendment-australia-great-britain-6-gun-law-changes-stu-bykofsky-20180220.html

[image/video deleted]
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
I have no confidence whatsoever in "background checks".

People engage in sociopathic behavior for years unchecked and people defend and enable their behavior.
True. But what if one background check out of fifty for example had a positive result. Like I said it’s a start not the final solution. Not starting has gotten us nowhere. @CopperCicada
@jackjjackson Legit.
More reporting required and actually reading background checks won’t hurt. @CopperCicada
hlpflwthat · M
@CopperCicada @jackjjackson Background checks have more value than the occasional discovery, they also act as deterrent. The person who thinks "No way would they ever let me buy a gun" probably needn't be armed, when you think about it.