Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Guns: Here is one writer’s idea. Can anyone disagree with this as a starting point?

Universal background checks. This means a National Instant Criminal Background Check for every buyer of every firearm. Last July, Pew Research Center found that 85 percent of Americans — 88 percent of Democrats and 79 percent of Republicans — favored making background checks mandatory for private gun sales and sales at gun shows. Those are Mom and Apple Pie numbers. An earlier poll by Frank Luntz found that a 74 percent majority of past and present NRA members favored expanded background checks.
Ban the bump stock used in Las Vegas. The bump stock turns a semiautomatic weapon into an automatic weapon, which already is banned. In a poll last year, a majority of registered voters wanted the device banned — 79 percent of Democrats and 68 percent of Republicans.
Deny guns to patients diagnosed mentally ill. A HuffPost/YouGov poll in 2014 showed that 54 percent to 23 percent of Americans wanted states to confiscate guns owned by people diagnosed with mental illness. There should be a review process to restore their rights after they recover.
Deny guns to suspected terrorists. Those on a watch list, who currently can buy guns, must be stopped. A method to restore rights must be included.
Age 21 to buy any gun. Under federal law, you must be 21 to buy a handgun. Raise to 21 the age to buy a rifle. It is lethal, too.
One gun purchase a month. That will slow the multiple straw purchaser illegally buying for someone not eligible to own.

http://www.philly.com/philly/columnists/stu_bykofsky/nra-second-amendment-australia-great-britain-6-gun-law-changes-stu-bykofsky-20180220.html

[image deleted]
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
I have no confidence whatsoever in "background checks".

People engage in sociopathic behavior for years unchecked and people defend and enable their behavior.
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
True. But what if one background check out of fifty for example had a positive result. Like I said it’s a start not the final solution. Not starting has gotten us nowhere. @CopperCicada
@jackjjackson Legit.
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
More reporting required and actually reading background checks won’t hurt. @CopperCicada
hlpflwthat · M
@CopperCicada @jackjjackson Background checks have more value than the occasional discovery, they also act as deterrent. The person who [i][b]thinks[/b][/i] "No way would they ever let me buy a gun" probably needn't be armed, when you think about it.