Why do 'Palestinians' think they own the land where Israel sits?

@girlscumfirst Because Jewish history in that region started in 1949 lol

@girlscumfirst WP munitions, or "phosphorous bombs" are hardly illegal. Well, illegal for me to own, but not for military use.

@girlscumfirst You haven't got the faintest idea what you're talking about. Which country is occupied? Palestine has never been a country. The Arabs got their country in the area known as Palestine, it's called Jordan. Now go and study the subject you ignorant twat. As for Gaza, they deserve to be on lockdown. Blame Hamas for that.

@PrairieBreeder Pathetic crap. They are illegal for military use under UN resolutions that the US signed up to. They are the equivalent of the napalm bombs that the americans dropped in Vietnam on women and children.

@quietlitany Under your backwards logic the people of England still have a claim to Northern Germany because they had some ancestors leave it back in the dark ages.

@MethDozer It's backwards that Jews have an extensive history in that region?

@UkBull You must be an american. I have more than an idea of what I am talking about. Jordan is not Palestine (you pathetic, ignorant cunt).

@girlscumfirst "There are multiple international laws that could be seen to regulate white phosphorus use.[91] Article 1 of Protocol III of the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons defines an incendiary weapon as "any weapon or munition which is primarily designed to set fire to objects or to cause burn injury to persons through the action of flame, heat, or combination there of, produced by a chemical reaction of a substance delivered on the target". The same protocol prohibits the use of said incendiary weapons against civilians (already forbidden by the Geneva Conventions) or in civilian areas. The convention also defines weapons which are not to be considered to be incendiary weapons.

Examples are:

(i) Munitions which may have incidental incendiary effects, such as illuminants, tracers, smoke or signalling systems;
(ii) Munitions designed to combine penetration, blast or fragmentation effects with an additional incendiary effect.
Weapons containing white phosphorus but that are not incendiary weapons are not regulated by the above protocol."

Straight from wikipedia. _NOT REGULATED_. so not illegal.

Oh, and napalm? Also a great idea.

@PrairieBreeder Ignorant shit. Explain why white phosphorus is used. When you do so, explain why the UN condemed israel for using white phosphorus bombs on the most densely populated area of the world.

@girlscumfirst Hahaha go and look up the original mandate for Palestine and learn something. How on earth do you think Transjordan was created?

@PrairieBreeder ...another very obvious american

@girlscumfirst smoke for concealment. Marker rockets for artillery and air strikes.

And no, asia is far more densely populated, maybe some parts of India as well.

HA! American? Not even close. Try again dipshit.

My username has "UK" in it you idiot!

@UkBull Doubtless you mean the Balfour declaration. You should read it and learn.

@PrairieBreeder Oh well, you are sufficiently ignorant to qualify

@girlscumfirst Says the guy who's the first in this discussion to sling insults without backing them up. The first to preach research, but the last to post any sort of credible information or provide a link.

Ignorance seems to be your specialty, no?

@UkBull Oh dear, another piece of shit that ought to be deported

@girlscumfirst You're going way too hard honey.

@girlscumfirst Deported from where? Are you so completely obtuse that you think anyone posting on the internet _HAS_ to be doing so from within your pathetic small minded country?

@PrairieBreeder It would take a while to post the information that you are ignorant of. Indeed, a very long while.

Oh, you're hilarious. Taking the "high ground" of "you wouldn't understand anyway", without knowing the education level of your opponent is hardly a new tactic on the internet. It's never effective, however.

Especially when you've _NO_ idea who you're dealing with. Believe me, I know what you're trying to say and you're _VERY_ wrong. ;)

@PrairieBreeder Since my comment was directed at UKBull, I am surprised that you choose to reply.

Oh dear...I live in a "pathetic small minded country". You may care to reflect that the majority of the men who signed your declaration of independence were from my country.