Top | Newest First | Oldest First
TheRealDonaldTrumpMaga · 70-79, M
Hillary and company for sure..
View 16 more replies »
windinhishair · 61-69, M
@Pitchblue Have they ever stopped?
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
@windinhishair @Pitchblue @snowbelt @snowbelt
Sadly the insults fly from all sides with each side claiming the other side’s insults are worse.
Sadly the insults fly from all sides with each side claiming the other side’s insults are worse.
TheRealDonaldTrumpMaga · 70-79, M
RodionRomanovitch · 56-60, M
I asked this back in April and the odds I gave then are still a pretty good reflection I think of who might be indicted first. (I only added Trump Jr. after the Trump Tower meeting was revealed.)
https://similarworlds.com/18-Politics/751852-Who-do-you-think-is-most-likely-to-end-up-in-jail
Personally I would love it to be Kushner but I suppose that can wait 'til later. The smart money has to be on Flynn or Manafort.
https://similarworlds.com/18-Politics/751852-Who-do-you-think-is-most-likely-to-end-up-in-jail
Personally I would love it to be Kushner but I suppose that can wait 'til later. The smart money has to be on Flynn or Manafort.
snowbelt · 61-69, M
@RodionRomanovitch We will know soon!
Unless it's obvious, like Flynn or Manafort, I'm guessing it will be a secretary or someone really low level.
If Mueller is doing it right, he's looking for people to turn, so that when he indicts his big fish, he can nail them.
This will drag out, imo. It's not going to be over unless Trump moves to shut it down. And that would make more trouble for him.
If Mueller is doing it right, he's looking for people to turn, so that when he indicts his big fish, he can nail them.
This will drag out, imo. It's not going to be over unless Trump moves to shut it down. And that would make more trouble for him.
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
@Clemency
What time did reality dawn on you Election night? I’m not professing to know the outcome however you seem to be celebrating a little early. The last time you did that you looked somewhat foolish. Just sayin.
What time did reality dawn on you Election night? I’m not professing to know the outcome however you seem to be celebrating a little early. The last time you did that you looked somewhat foolish. Just sayin.
This message was deleted by its author.
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
@Clemency
Hmmmm. Now threatening war? So yes you did start celebrating on election night only to have it all crash down around you. We’re you crying alone or at a party with fellow travelers?
Hmmmm. Now threatening war? So yes you did start celebrating on election night only to have it all crash down around you. We’re you crying alone or at a party with fellow travelers?
Flynn and Manafort would be excellent. Especially because Trump kept in contact with both. What will Trump do to deflect from that?
TheOneyouwerewarnedabout · 41-45, MVIP
Podosa
katielass · F
@luckranger71 Mueller expanded his investigation into clinton, her campaign and the dnc several weeks ago.
katielass · F
@TheOneyouwerewarnedabout The uranium is a different issue. Both houses of congress are not investigating and it is likely that a special prosecutor will be appointed to investigate. that involves national security so it will not be a joke.
RodionRomanovitch · 56-60, M
@TheOneyouwerewarnedabout It's Podesta you muppet. I don't think any more proof is needed to conclude you know precisely nothing about which you speak.
HoraceGreenley · 56-60, M
[image deleted]
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
CountScrofula · 41-45, M
Probably Flynn and/or Manafort but who knows. They could have uncovered something out of left field. Like, a Democrat is possible but less probable considering Trump's campaign is the target.
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
Dainbramadge · 56-60, M
Looks like a bunch I guess.
katielass · F
@jackjjackson Nope. Fox and abc reported it. Well, it makes sense. Mueller is investigating Russian interference with our election and that is certainly not limited to trump and associates. It's logical that once all roads to trump were exhausted and the discovery that the clinton campaign and the dnc were involved with the firm who got info supplied by Russia and paid for it, well why would it be a surprise that his investigation would expand to include the dems. I believe the dems are going to be terribly disappointed.
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
katielass · F
@jackjjackson Oh yes.
luckranger71 · 51-55, M
Prizes to those of you who called Manafort. If anyone had Gates they deserve special kudos.
Alabamiangods · 41-45, F
CopperCicada · M
I doubt anybody. If anybody somebody far from the WH. Some schmuck in a GOP campaign office will be spun as a sole gunman, a mastermind.
This message was deleted by its author.
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
@jackjjackson That's a problem the Democrats have, do they just say fuckit to all integrity and say anything to get votes like Trump did or not. But having the President colluding with an adversarial country is a bigger problem.
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
@Pitchblue
Even Mrs Clinton says there were more reasons than that. Mrs Clinton was simply a bad candidate. It seems like virtually any other candidate would have beaten Trump and no one would be grasping at these straws.
Even Mrs Clinton says there were more reasons than that. Mrs Clinton was simply a bad candidate. It seems like virtually any other candidate would have beaten Trump and no one would be grasping at these straws.