Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Yikes….😬😬😬 hey this is prophecy also

[media=https://youtu.be/Cbrd4n0PRKM]
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
@SW-User @revenant regarding the ozone hole [quote]It's repairing itself because CFC's were banned. It's the greatest environmental treaty that was ever written. And it worked.[/quote] Absolutely true.

The antarctic ozone hole is a case that demonstrates both humanity's ability to affect the atmosphere and humanity's ability to fix the damage we've done. The ozone hole began shrinking when we reduced CFC outputs by over 99%.

[quote]NASA began measuring Earth’s stratospheric ozone layer by satellite in 1979. By the time the Montreal Protocol went into effect in 1989, ozone concentrations (in Dobson units) had declined significantly over the Antarctic, enlarging the ozone hole. [/quote]

The American Chemical Society says:
[quote] [b]Chlorofluorocarbons and Ozone Depletion[/b]
A National Historic Chemical Landmark
. . .
“When we realized there was a very effective chain reaction, that changed the CFC investigation from an interesting scientific problem to one that had major environmental consequences,” Rowland told Chemical & Engineering News in an extensive interview in 2007. “You don’t often get many chills down your back when you look at scientific results,” he added, but that had been one of those moments.[/quote]
https://www.acs.org/content/acs/en/education/whatischemistry/landmarks/cfcs-ozone.html

Want more?
[quote]Research studies in the laboratory show that chlorine (Cl) reacts very rapidly with ozone. They also show that the reactive chemical chlorine monoxide (ClO) formed in that reaction can undergo further processes that regenerate the original chlorine, allowing the sequence to be repeated very many times (a chain reaction). Similar reactions also take place between bromine and ozone.

But do these ozone-destroying reactions occur in the "real world"? All the accumulated scientific experience demonstrates that the same chemical reactions do take place in nature. Many other reactions (including those of other chemical species) are often also taking place simultaneously in the stratosphere. This makes the connections among the changes difficult to untangle. Nevertheless, whenever chlorine (or bromine) and ozone are found together in the stratosphere, the ozone-destroying reactions are taking place.

Sometimes a small number of chemical reactions are so dominant in the natural circumstance that the connections are almost as clear as in laboratory experiments. Such a situation occurs in the Antarctic stratosphere during the springtime formation of the ozone hole. Independent measurements made by instruments from the ground and from balloons, aircraft, and satellites have provided a detailed understanding of the chemical reactions in the Antarctic stratosphere. Large areas reach temperatures so low (less than 80°C, or 112°F) that stratospheric clouds form, which is a rare occurrence, except during the polar winters. These polar stratospheric clouds allow chemical reactions that transform chlorine species from forms that do not cause ozone depletion into forms that do cause ozone depletion. Among the latter is chlorine monoxide, which initiates ozone destruction in the presence of sunlight. The amount of reactive chlorine in such regions is therefore much higher than that observed in the middle latitudes, which leads to much faster chemical ozone destruction. The chemical reactions occurring in the presence of these clouds are now well understood from studies under laboratory conditions that mimic those found naturally in the atmosphere.[/quote]
SW-User
@ElwoodBlues I know all this, thank you :) It was an incredible achievement.

@revenant refuses to believe it for some reason.
@SW-User Yeah, it's nice to have the facts and links on hand to show trolls like @revenant that their trolling only makes them look dumb.
SW-User
@ElwoodBlues The thing is, no amount of facts will change their minds, so it's best for all of us if we just let them be. Stop responding, starve them of oxygen, they'll go away.
JimboSaturn · 51-55, M
@SW-User Some people refuse to accept reality and instead feel like the are woke free thinkers for doing that. I think it makes them feel special. There are mountains of data and proof of this very well documted success
SW-User
@JimboSaturn "Free thinkers" like @revenant follow a pattern. They scroll YouTube and TikTok etc. (NEVER MSM 😱) and find videos from psychic podcasters or sth that say something like

“I’m going to connect some dots and I’m going to present you with some information. What you do with this information is up to you.”

This pretty much sums up the approach of all online conspiracy theorists: presenting loaded facts and information, and encouraging you, the free thinker, to piece them together in your mind. It makes you feel smart, and the creator gets to avoid any explicit claims that might get them in trouble.

Then, when you confront said free thinkers, you get “do your own research!” (AKA type conspiracy keywords into Google) and buy the cryptocurrencies they recommend (which they definitely DON'T have a financial stake in) in time for the Great Reset :D
@ElwoodBlues as a taswegian, who grew up under this 'hole in the ozone layer ' i can confidently say that " its no biggie to human skin".
Vegetation - yes .
Humans - no.

But we just put sunblock on year round 🤷‍♀️