This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Sroonaka616 · 31-35, M
Try to recreate the one small step for man speach.
LordShadowfire · 46-50, M
@swirlie Now I remember what the conflict was with you. It wasn't about vaccines, it was about the fact that was quite obviously went to the moon, because faking It for the last 60 years would actually be harder.
swirlie · 31-35
@LordShadowfire
The US government faked the Assassination of JFK by Lee Harvey Oswald for the last 60 years, so faking a moon landing from 60 years ago would be a cake walk for them.
The US government faked the Assassination of JFK by Lee Harvey Oswald for the last 60 years, so faking a moon landing from 60 years ago would be a cake walk for them.
MissBarbara · 70-79, F
@Sroonaka616 There is no such word as "speach". It's "speech".
LordShadowfire · 46-50, M
@swirlie Fascinating. I await the evidence you have for this positive assertion.
swirlie · 31-35
@LordShadowfire
...and I await the evidence you have that Neil Armstrong walked on the moon... and I don't mean the generic fairytale that was created by the US government who told NASA what to say to the studio audience during America's space race with Russia!
...and I await the evidence you have that Neil Armstrong walked on the moon... and I don't mean the generic fairytale that was created by the US government who told NASA what to say to the studio audience during America's space race with Russia!
LordShadowfire · 46-50, M
@swirlie It doesn't work that way. There's plenty of video evidence, but you choose to dismiss it. There's also photographs of the Moon showing where we left stuff. Short of actually taking you personally to the Moon to look at the sites where our astronauts left footprints and flags, there's nothing more I can do.
Now prove your claim that it was done in a sound stage.
Now prove your claim that it was done in a sound stage.
swirlie · 31-35
@LordShadowfire
Sorry LordShadow, but that excuse doesn't fly with me! The only thing you know about Neil Armstrong walking on the moon, is what you've been told by the US government through the voice of NASA.
What we know for sure is that a lunar mission just like the alleged moon-walk mission in question, could never be repeated today, nor would any of it be believable if it was tried again using the same equipment they used back in the 1960's. That alone should tell you that if it couldn't be repeated today with any level of believability, then it didn't actually happen back then either.
Considering the difficulty space enthusiasts are having today just getting to the international space station or even getting to the technical boundaries of outer space, there were way too many moving parts in that moon-walk mission of almost 60 years ago, to take any of it seriously.
Sorry LordShadow, but that excuse doesn't fly with me! The only thing you know about Neil Armstrong walking on the moon, is what you've been told by the US government through the voice of NASA.
What we know for sure is that a lunar mission just like the alleged moon-walk mission in question, could never be repeated today, nor would any of it be believable if it was tried again using the same equipment they used back in the 1960's. That alone should tell you that if it couldn't be repeated today with any level of believability, then it didn't actually happen back then either.
Considering the difficulty space enthusiasts are having today just getting to the international space station or even getting to the technical boundaries of outer space, there were way too many moving parts in that moon-walk mission of almost 60 years ago, to take any of it seriously.
LordShadowfire · 46-50, M
@swirlie It's so extremely convenient to be able to dismiss all of that evidence with a wave of your hand.
swirlie · 31-35
@LordShadowfire
...just as you've dismissed my rejection of the alleged American moon-walk by making reference to what you've been repeatedly told by your government since your childhood, then presented to me as the basis for your argument. You can't have it both ways, LordShadowfire.
...just as you've dismissed my rejection of the alleged American moon-walk by making reference to what you've been repeatedly told by your government since your childhood, then presented to me as the basis for your argument. You can't have it both ways, LordShadowfire.
LordShadowfire · 46-50, M
@swirlie That's not how burden of proof works. You've dismissed the tons of video, photographic, and data evidence that have been presented to you, and presented your own positive assertion that it was done in a sound studio without providing a single shred of evidence for your counterclaim.
Decades of evidence in favor of actually going to the moon versus your conspiracy theory with only "trust me bro" for evidence.
Decades of evidence in favor of actually going to the moon versus your conspiracy theory with only "trust me bro" for evidence.
swirlie · 31-35
@LordShadowfire
That video and photographic evidence you make reference to could only have been shot on earth, but not on the moon. The wireless technology wasn't in place at the time for any of that to happen as that evidence you make reference to was being played out.
That video and photographic evidence you make reference to could only have been shot on earth, but not on the moon. The wireless technology wasn't in place at the time for any of that to happen as that evidence you make reference to was being played out.
LordShadowfire · 46-50, M
@swirlie You want to know how they broadcast from the moon to the Earth? Here.
https://www.scienceandmediamuseum.org.uk/objects-and-stories/moon-to-living-room-apollo-11-broadcast
But of course, you'll dismiss that evidence with a poisoning the well fallacy (yOu GoT tHaT fRoM tHe GoVeRnMeNt!!1!) and continue to push your own unsubstantiated assertions.
https://www.scienceandmediamuseum.org.uk/objects-and-stories/moon-to-living-room-apollo-11-broadcast
But of course, you'll dismiss that evidence with a poisoning the well fallacy (yOu GoT tHaT fRoM tHe GoVeRnMeNt!!1!) and continue to push your own unsubstantiated assertions.
swirlie · 31-35
@LordShadowfire
THAT is what the US government tells everyone and you eat up that krap like it was your last meal. What you believe is truth is only what your government tells you is truth. Everything Americans know about the space program of the 1960's they were told by their government, which means nobody actually witnessed it except those who allegedly walked on the moon, but who were sworn to secrecy that they would never discuss it publicly.... and they never did!
Why did they not discuss it?
Because THEY WERE NEVER ON THE MOON, that's why!
THAT is what the US government tells everyone and you eat up that krap like it was your last meal. What you believe is truth is only what your government tells you is truth. Everything Americans know about the space program of the 1960's they were told by their government, which means nobody actually witnessed it except those who allegedly walked on the moon, but who were sworn to secrecy that they would never discuss it publicly.... and they never did!
Why did they not discuss it?
Because THEY WERE NEVER ON THE MOON, that's why!