Crazy is as crazy does
The "Hollow Moon" theory, a concept popular in science fiction, proposes that Earth's Moon is either entirely hollow or contains a large interior space. This idea contrasts with mainstream scientific understanding, which indicates the Moon has a solid inner core, a mantle, and a crust. NASA scientists have even found evidence suggesting the Moon's subsurface might be richer in metals like iron and titanium than previously thought.
Here's why the Hollow Moon theory is not supported by scientific evidence:
Moon's Structure:
Scientific data, including seismic readings and gravitational analysis, indicates the Moon has a layered structure similar to other terrestrial bodies, with a core, mantle, and crust.
Seismic Activity:
While some unexpected vibrations have been recorded, these are more likely attributed to the presence of water in the lunar crust, causing it to resonate longer, rather than the moon being hollow.
Metal Richness:
Recent radar data suggests the Moon's subsurface is more metallic than previously believed, further contradicting the idea of a hollow interior.
Artificial Origin:
The theory of a hollow moon also raises questions about its artificial origin and the feasibility of placing a celestial body of that size into orbit, which is not supported by scientific evidence.
In summary, the Hollow Moon theory is a fascinating concept in science fiction, but it is not supported by scientific evidence. The Moon's structure, seismic activity, and metal content point to a natural celestial body with a layered composition.
[media=https://youtu.be/4TOMUFHHnVM]
Here's why the Hollow Moon theory is not supported by scientific evidence:
Moon's Structure:
Scientific data, including seismic readings and gravitational analysis, indicates the Moon has a layered structure similar to other terrestrial bodies, with a core, mantle, and crust.
Seismic Activity:
While some unexpected vibrations have been recorded, these are more likely attributed to the presence of water in the lunar crust, causing it to resonate longer, rather than the moon being hollow.
Metal Richness:
Recent radar data suggests the Moon's subsurface is more metallic than previously believed, further contradicting the idea of a hollow interior.
Artificial Origin:
The theory of a hollow moon also raises questions about its artificial origin and the feasibility of placing a celestial body of that size into orbit, which is not supported by scientific evidence.
In summary, the Hollow Moon theory is a fascinating concept in science fiction, but it is not supported by scientific evidence. The Moon's structure, seismic activity, and metal content point to a natural celestial body with a layered composition.
[media=https://youtu.be/4TOMUFHHnVM]
31-35, M
