Not all naked pics are sexy though, right? [I Love Sexy Pics]
Let's face it; they're not. Some are, and some are not.
Well, one of the most prolific purveyors of pics on SW is my friend @Ambroseguy80. His habit of feeding SW's daily appetite for sexy guys & girls has driven his profile to over 60,000 views (and yes, I'm one of his near daily visitors).
But what makes a naked pic sexy? Everyone has a "type" and Amby certainly knows mine. In one recent comment thread, I remarked that he should just allow me to curate his posts because the ones I hearted seemed to get a higher number of hearts from the SW community at large.
Well, one thing led to another and the idea of proving that claim came to me. Okay, so here goes ... Do my fav pics rate higher? And what else correlates to higher rated pics?
My analysis went back through 55 posts from Amby and recorded many variables (male/female, tattoos, piercings, approximate boob size, "badonk" status of any butts shown, etc). Since he does not often post guys, they were dropped from my data (too low an occurrence yields statistically invalid data). Similarly, there were not enough instances of tats or piercings or body paint to analyze their influence so they were dropped as well.
So what was left? Fifty-five posts of naked or nearly naked women showing various attributes. :) On average, you all rated them up with 23 hearts with a range from 10 hearts on the low side to 46 on the high side:
Let's get to my initial claim first: That the pics I hearted were higher rated on average than the pics I didn't heart (and yes, I only used pics from before this discussion so as not to bias the results):
The pics I had previously hearted received on average 29.2 hearts. The ones I didn't heart, received only 15.5 hearts
Okay, so Amby should clearly run his posts by me for the 👍 or 👎 before wasting everyone's time! ;)
But what else drives hearts in the world of sexy pics? How about the presence of the woman's face? Clearly you must like to gaze longingly into our eyes, right? Nope. No impact whatsoever on the number of hearts. 🙄
How about the presence of boobs in the pic? Does that drive hearts? Again, nope. Pics with boobs averaged ~23 hearts; pics without boobs averaged ~24 hearts (insignificant diff). But wait ... what about size??
Wait! What??? You guys all actually prefer smaller boobs?? Amby: Take note! (Size rating purely arbitrary by me 😁)
Butt what about butts? Lol, yes, I've been waiting to say that! 😉 Does the presence of a naked butt in the pic drive hearts? Again, just as with boobs: Nope. You peeps don't care. Pics both with and without butts rate about the same number of hearts. Butt, what about the size of the butt? Does a Badonk-esque butt rate higher or lower than other butts?
What?!?!? Really? You SWeeps like Badonks better?? 🤦♀️ And of course, the official SW arbiter of Badonk status is @TexChik's comments. 😉
I hope you've found this exercise informative and educational. And before you criticize me for this, what did you do on your fourteen day quarantine?!?! 🤨
This is not the first time I've gleaned statistics from his posts. Check this out for my first statistical analysis of Amby's work: https://similarworlds.com/2435000-I-Like-Natural-Boobs/825555-Hey-Ladies-Ready-for-some-fun-And-by-the-way-thats.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
No, not all pictures are sexy. I agree with the smaller boobs and bigger butt stats. Bigger bottoms are more appealing to me, smaller boobs are more appealing to me. I think you should have included length of their legs in your quest for what's hot. I would take long shapely legs over just about any other combination. Facial features mean a lot for a sexy photo for me. A fairly sexy woman with an open smile appears sexier than a flawless woman who looks like she just ate a sour persimmon.
@sarabee1995 If there is a look of enjoyment or happiness on a woman's face in a picture, she appears more attractive. I can't explain why I take such an interest in the facial expression, maybe just hoping she is enjoying herself as much as I am.
@sarabee1995 Looking at your info, just figured out you were a squid, Semper Fi. I generally go against statistics. If the majority of people think one way about anything, I am pretty much the polar opposite. I am okay with it though, being the square peg has been good for me.
@Roadsterrider Yes sir, and thank you. Marines, eh? I just got back with USS Eisenhower and we (obviously) had some Marines onboard. You guys need to lighten up a bit sometimes! 😉
@sarabee1995 Lighten up a bit? That's why I got out. I did 14 with AV-8s and C-130s and a year as an engineer/demo guy, 1371. I have been out for over 20 years and I still miss it sometimes. Well, the people anyway. Wouldn't change it for the world. Still in aviation but the hard charging "get it done" mentality isn't there in General Aviation. Things move too slow sometimes. I appreciate you and what you do, thanks. Keep your powder dry.
@Roadsterrider Very nice. Harriers? Cool. Something about a tactical aircraft hovering is just way cool. I was on Ike attached to AW3 working with the EA squadron. Every single day was an adrenaline rush. Back on dry land now. 🙂
@sarabee1995 Maintenance on the Harrier sucks. It is such a cool aircraft but working on it, the A and C models anyway, is a nightmare. The C-130 was so much easier to work on, and they don't go on boats. I did 14 years and never got on a ship except for the USS North Carolina in dry dock and a whale boat for bay ops during aircrew candidate school. Now I work on helicopter engines in civilian aviation.
@sarabee1995 I joined in 1984, 19 years old, married and young and dumb. I was stationed at Cherry Point, we did 6 month pumps but there was always someone who wanted to go so I never went. They only spent a few days in port anyway. Then I got into the C-130 squadron, I had some cool trips to Norway, Hawaii, a couple of the atolls in the Pacific. Lots of time in Yuma AZ and 29 palms. Good stuff. I had 14 years in and 8 years time and grade as an E-5 and had never been before a promotion board, 1994 to about 2000, promotion to Staff was non existent. I was eligible to reenlist because I hadn't been before a board but I qualified for VSI so I took the money and ran in 1999. If I had stayed in I would have retired in 2004. I can't complain though, what I learned in the Corps has paid the bills and I have a pretty good job and benefits still. I keep up with some of the guys I served with. Within a year of me getting out, most of the Sgts were promoted and then after 9-11, they all picked up Gunny pretty quickly. Water under the bridge and, I had the time of my life.
@sarabee1995 Did he make it out? I did my ground side time in a reserve unit, I am sure most of the serious grunts have a little more testicular fortitude than I do. Not sure I could have pulled off some of the stuff they do.
@sarabee1995 My wife is a nurse and has always worked in nursing homes, I have been blessed with having a chance to talk to men who served on Iwo Jima, Chosin Reservoir, Guadalcanal, one old pilot who went from prop planes to the F80 Sabre Jet. Combat correspondents, and one doggie who was part of a wind talker outfit. I would take then Navy or Marine Corps t-shirts and listen to the stories. My generation had it pretty easy and I had it easy in the air wing, those old guys had a stronger mettle.
