Random
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

“All the President’s Men”

This book is by Woodward and Bernstein, the Washington Post reporters who doggedly investigated the issue of the Watergate scandal in the early 1970s.

I read it in the mid-70s and at that time I was fascinated by the wild events that occurred in Washington, DC, the city where everybody talks endlessly but few ever say anything.

Maybe because I am less naive, rereading it had a totally different effect. Each of the many many characters in this huge puzzle had their own reasons for their involvement, good or bad. The leaks of information vary from plain sloppiness to Machiavellian reasoning.

Just now I am finishing The Final Days (same authors), which is concerned with the process which led to Richard Nixon resignation (or abdication) from the Presidency.

At no time was there any serious consideration about the people for whom all these elected officials “worked”.

They worried first about themselves and their personal ambitions, then about their political party, and finally about the President, who was exhibiting deteriorating mental health.

Gosh, that sounds familiar.

Both books can be tedious, due to the nature of the subject. But I consider them not only fascinating but educational.

We need to understand how our government works, not only the mechanical details of government, but how it ACTUALLY works.
Top | New | Old
JustNik · 51-55, F
I was part of the problem for half of my life, totally complacent, and then for a long time my attention only extended to election times. I still find it mind boggling. It seems to me that even the few who get into it because they want to serve their constituents are quickly buried under the greed and corruption, either because they succumb to it or they simply can’t overcome it. I’ve noticed the worse it’s gotten the more I seem to hear “the American people.” The gaslights are blinding.
@JustNik I picture D.C. as a gang. As well-intentioned as a newcomer may be, they quickly learn that to stay alive politically, there are taxes to pay. You promised your state an important and expensive bridge? Just tack it on to a bill you abhor and sign on the dotted.

You’ll get your bridge, but now we’ve got you.
dancingtongue · 80-89, M
I don't know, maybe I just lived in another time when we were taught critical thinking in school, and got real time exposure to the nature of politics through student body and class elections, as well as Boys and Girls State, where elections were not only about popularity. Political power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Our founders' vision of Congress being a part-time gig, where farmers and shopkeepers spent their vacation/downtime in Washington for a couple of weeks, never truly existed.

Then I remember that the major part of my political education came from my parents, who religiously debated political events, conventions, and not in ideological or mythological terms but in trying to gain glimpses into how the sausage was being made. (My mother was the first in either side of the family to go to college and tended to have a broader, yet conservative, perspective; my father never made it to high school, but was intelligent, well-read, and observant as well as being more conservative in the rugged individualism stream of the cowboy he was.)

And my graduate course came in the print shop at lunch in high school, with two older classmates (Bob Meisenbach, who gave my nominating speech for Student Body President, and Carroll Selph). Meisenbach is considered the Father of the Sixties, the ex-Marine tried for allegedly hitting a SF police officer with his own baton, who was not only acquitted but his trial exposed the FBI's provocateur and disinformation efforts under J. Edgar Hoover. Both he and Carroll were flushed down the steps of SF City Hall's rotunda for protesting the House Un-American Activities Committee hearing.
@dancingtongue The insane part of this particular incident was that it was fixable and it would have been simple, except…the incident was not the first, and the core group responsible for the burglary at the Watergate Hotel were hired and directed by prominent White House figures…and those octopus tentacles dragged down the whole house of cards.
dancingtongue · 80-89, M
@Mamapolo2016 Which is what makes some of us still have hope.
@dancingtongue Fingers crossed.
I’ve both read this book and seen the movie based upon it that starred Robert Redford & Dustin Hoffman. Watergate happened while I was in high school. We both studied about it and watched tv news reports in real time.

A president having to resign was the biggest political scandal a lot of us had seen up to that point. Pop says at the time he wondered if there would be another GOP president that century—but that he clearly overestimated the memory of the American people.
@bijouxbroussard Yes. The movie is easier to follow:
JollyRoger · 70-79, M
When in my career (latter part of it) I had the task of writing for senior executives in the department. They would hand me a letter from some big-shot or an invitation to some sort of event and ask me to analyze the request, prepare a reply or some 'speaking notes' or a 'briefing note' and when I handed that to them: I was amazed at how they would read it, hardly question it and sign it!

My point?: I was low on the totem pole but they relied on me to brief government, and in some cases international agencies based on my own research and integrity. Wow.... who'd have thunk that in some cases I was influencing international affairs? And that, I'm sure is what happens in Washington too...that these political people only half-read what someone (like me) wrote and then start giving orders.
@JollyRoger I think you are quite right. A more recent example, if it’s true, is Harry, the former Royal, signing contracts and prenuptial agreements without reading them.
bookerdana · M
the President, who was exhibiting deteriorating mental health.

Gosh, that sounds familiar. 😀 sure does
UKNaturist · M
Not read the book but definitely one of my favourite movies
@UKNaturist I think the movie does a good job conveying the story. But it can’t show you the thousand layers that exist.
UKNaturist · M
@Mamapolo2016 - I can imagine. Complicated time in history
@UKNaturist No more complicated than what we are currently watching. Except we believed garbage more easily then.
RachelLia2003 · 22-25, F
its not womens job
@RachelLia2003 Not then, although there were powerful women in Washington well before the 70s.
RachelLia2003 · 22-25, F
@Mamapolo2016 trump für 2028

 
Post Comment