Random
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Why Did Paramount Settle Its Trump Lawsuit

Source: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c3w4n8778q2o

US media company Paramount Global has agreed to pay $16 million (£13.5m) to settle a legal dispute with US President Donald Trump regarding an interview it broadcast on CBS with former Vice-President Kamala Harris.

Trump filed a lawsuit last October, alleging the network had deceptively edited an interview that aired on its 60 Minutes news programme with his presidential election rival Kamala Harris, to "tip the scales in favour of the Democratic party".

Paramount said it would pay to settle the suit, but with the money allocated to Trump's future presidential library, not paid to him "directly or indirectly".

The company noted the settlement does not include a statement of apology or regret.

A spokesperson for Trump's legal team swiftly hailed the settlement as a "win for the American people" over the "fake news media".

"CBS and Paramount Global realised the strength of this historic case and had no choice but to settle," the spokesperson added. "President Trump will always ensure that no one gets away with lying to the American people."

CBS, which is owned by Paramount, previously said the case was "completely without merit" and had asked a judge to dismiss it. It stressed the broadcast was "not doctored or deceitful".

The settlement marks the latest concession by a US media company to a president who has targeted outlets over what he describes as false or misleading coverage.

According to the lawsuit filed in federal court in Texas, CBS aired two versions of the Harris interview in which she appeared to give different answers to the same question about the Israel-Gaza war.

Interviewer Bill Whitaker asked the Democratic nominee about the Biden administration's relationship with Israel. The network later aired two different versions of her response, according to the claim.

One clip aired on Face the Nation and the other on 60 Minutes. Trump claimed Harris's "word salad" answer had been deceptively edited in one version to shield her from backlash.

CBS, which is the BBC's US news partner, said it edited Harris's answer for time, in accordance with television news standards.

Trump sued, originally claiming for $10bn (£8.5bn) but that figure was later increased to $20bn ($17bn) for damages.

In May this year, the company offered $15m (12.7m) to settle the suit but Trump wanted more than $25m (£21m).

In a statement released on Tuesday, Paramount confirmed the settlement fee included the president's legal fees, and that it had agreed that 60 Minutes will release transcripts of interviews with future presidential candidates.

Settled ahead of planned merger

According to both the Wall Street Journal and New York Times, the settlement was agreed - with the help of mediator - so as to not affect Paramount's planned merger with Skydance Media, which the Federal Communications Commission has been reviewing and therefore Trump technically has the power to halt.

During the month-long settlement talks, some CBS News executives including chief executive Wendy McMahon have left their roles, due to their unwillingness to issue an apology to Trump.

There were also reportedly concerns over whether paying to settle the lawsuit could be viewed as bribing a public official.

The Paramount settlement follows a decision by Walt Disney-owned ABC News to settle a defamation case brought by Trump.
Top | New | Old
LegendofPeza · 61-69, M
From someone who knows more than most ; "The thing is you cannot even effectively take this out on Paramount. This decision came from the top, from the woman who has been looking to offload a company she inherited and didn’t want to run or own. It is a company that has lost its way in the streaming era due to the amount of focus the top execs had on their years long project of finding a buyer. Without a new direction it will continue to depreciate in value and so the owner just wants to get out and does not want any friction with Trump’s FTC who can block any proposed sale. This is simply a pay off to get the FTC so allow her long negotiated exit happen."
Northwest · M
@LegendofPeza
Trump’s FTC who can block any proposed sale.

Trump’s FTC that will block any proposed sale. if Trump was not paid off.
Northwest · M
This may be a blessing in disguise. Once Trump is out of office, Lawyers are going to be lined up to file suits, targeting Trump for interference, with his constant stream of lies during his media interviews, using this precedent, and then suing Skydance Media for chickening out.
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@Northwest I would like this to happen yet I suspect this won't effect new merger. It's the merger that is pushing more favorable views of Trump.

If you haven't noticed Steven Colbert is hinting about being fired. It's more than a lite joke though.
Convivial · 26-30, F
One large presidential thumb on the scales...
AthrillatheHunt · 51-55, M
Redstone wants the merger to go through so they told Paramount to pay. Cost of doing biz.

 
Post Comment