This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Musicman · 61-69, M
Absolutely! That sham wasn't a trial. Did you hear the judge's instructions to the Jury? He told them the prosecution didn't need to prove their case. That if they believed that he intended to defraud just one person they could find him guilty. Lol!!! 😂😂😂😂😂
Musicman · 61-69, M
@Nitedoc Absolutely he was. He should have recused himself in the beginning. Everything about this trial was wrong. Even his closing instructions to the jury. The prosecutor didn't need to prove his case. If you felt that in his mind if he even thought about defrauding one person, not even everyone, they could find him guilty. Have you ever heard anything like this before? And the Jury didn't even deliberate a day. It was definitely rigged from the beginning.
DallasCowboysFan · 61-69, M
@Musicman He also said they did not need a unanimous agreement to convict him.
Musicman · 61-69, M
@DallasCowboysFan When was the last time any judge ever gave instructions like this before???
DallasCowboysFan · 61-69, M
@Musicman Even the Wall Street Journal said the trial was shameful.
Musicman · 61-69, M
@DallasCowboysFan Now comes the appeal. Now we'll see how far up the ladder the fix is in.
DallasCowboysFan · 61-69, M
@Nitedoc What is the link to monitor his donations?
Nitedoc · 51-55, M
@DallasCowboysFan I don't know. I was repeating what Megyn Kelly's podcast and Newser.com said.