DogMan · 61-69, M
Democrats are pretending that You Tubers like Nick Shirley are killing people and ruining lives.
No one is killing anyone over videos. and the only lives ruined are the lives of people
ripping off the tax payers.
No one is killing anyone over videos. and the only lives ruined are the lives of people
ripping off the tax payers.
View 3 more replies »
trollslayer · 51-55, M
@DogMan you are defending jones?
trollslayer · 51-55, M
@DogMan what about nick sandmann? The georgia election workers?
DogMan · 61-69, M
@trollslayer Start a thread if you want to talk about them?
DogMan · 61-69, M
Just this year. If not for Nick Shirley, and Social media, Democrats would still be allowing this to happen.
As of mid-2026, roughly 64 to 66 people in Minnesota have been convicted of fraud in recent federal and state investigations.
Minnesota has experienced several large-scale fraud investigations, most notably the Feeding Our Future case, a nonprofit that falsely claimed to provide meals to schoolchildren during the COVID-19 pandemic.
By May 2026, out of 79 suspects indicted in this case, 65 had been convicted, including nearly 60 via plea deals and seven at trial, with additional cases still pending trial in related investigations
As of mid-2026, roughly 64 to 66 people in Minnesota have been convicted of fraud in recent federal and state investigations.
Minnesota has experienced several large-scale fraud investigations, most notably the Feeding Our Future case, a nonprofit that falsely claimed to provide meals to schoolchildren during the COVID-19 pandemic.
By May 2026, out of 79 suspects indicted in this case, 65 had been convicted, including nearly 60 via plea deals and seven at trial, with additional cases still pending trial in related investigations
DogMan · 61-69, M
@trollslayer Yes, Nick Shirley's videos forced the investigations by authorities. I thought that was
clear. Sorry you didn't understand.
FYI, many people blew the whistle on this fraud since 2015, but they didn't tell the public,
they went straight to the authorities, and the authorities shut them down.
Did you watch the hearings? It was all discussed. Making these things public forces the authorities
to do something. This is why Democrats are trying to stop it from happening. They DO NOT want
the public to know about this stuff.
clear. Sorry you didn't understand.
FYI, many people blew the whistle on this fraud since 2015, but they didn't tell the public,
they went straight to the authorities, and the authorities shut them down.
Did you watch the hearings? It was all discussed. Making these things public forces the authorities
to do something. This is why Democrats are trying to stop it from happening. They DO NOT want
the public to know about this stuff.
trollslayer · 51-55, M
@DogMan no, those investigations were underway before Shirley exploited them for personal and political gain. Those facts are readily available.
DogMan · 61-69, M
@trollslayer There were people TRYING to investigate, but the Democrats were not allowing it.
Again, have you watched the hearings? Don't be afraid of being wrong, just watch them.
Bringing fraud into the light, is a good thing. Why are Democrats protecting fraudsters?
Again, have you watched the hearings? Don't be afraid of being wrong, just watch them.
Bringing fraud into the light, is a good thing. Why are Democrats protecting fraudsters?
DogMan · 61-69, M
Feeding Our Future was a Minnesota nonprofit founded in 2016. During the COVID-19 pandemic, it claimed to distribute many thousands of meals to schoolchildren, but instead stole hundreds of millions of dollars while providing few or no meals at most of its locations. Merrick Garland, attorney general during the Biden administration, called it the country’s largest pandemic relief fraud scheme.[2]
DogMan · 61-69, M
Assembly Bill 2624 will outlaw sharing the photo or personal data of an immigrant services provider on the internet for harassment or violent purposes. Under the law, an immigrant services provider could bring a claim in court seeking up to at least $4,000 in damages from those who violate the law.
Harassment in this case means asking questions about their business, and/or what their business does.
Harassment in this case means asking questions about their business, and/or what their business does.
carpediem · M
Imagine the stupidity. It's breathtaking.
trollslayer · 51-55, M
The irony of this!!!!
DogMan · 61-69, M
@trollslayer Yep, they say they don't want fraud, but as soon as they see someone pointing it
out they create a brand new law protecting fraudsters.
out they create a brand new law protecting fraudsters.
TheOneyouwerewarnedabout · 46-50, MVIP
Federal laws trumps commiefornias laws..
1st amendment violations right thar
1st amendment violations right thar
DogMan · 61-69, M
California’s "monumental problem" with rampant fraud is about to get significantly worse, according to Republican state Assemblyman Carl DeMaio, after Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a bill that he warns will crack down on people investigating scammers.
Officially titled "Privacy for immigration support services providers," the new law creates privacy protections for immigration support service providers, employees and volunteers, including shielding their addresses and imposing penalties on those who publish their images on social media. DeMaio told Fox News Digital the bill amounts to criminalizing investigative journalism and works to "silence citizen journalists and shield taxpayer-funded organizations from public scrutiny."
"What does the Stop Nick Shirley Act do? It basically makes it illegal for a citizen journalist to document fraud of taxpayer money and post that on the internet in the form of an internet video," he said.
Officially titled "Privacy for immigration support services providers," the new law creates privacy protections for immigration support service providers, employees and volunteers, including shielding their addresses and imposing penalties on those who publish their images on social media. DeMaio told Fox News Digital the bill amounts to criminalizing investigative journalism and works to "silence citizen journalists and shield taxpayer-funded organizations from public scrutiny."
"What does the Stop Nick Shirley Act do? It basically makes it illegal for a citizen journalist to document fraud of taxpayer money and post that on the internet in the form of an internet video," he said.
DogMan · 61-69, M
The law also makes it illegal to post a participant's personal information or image online with the intent to threaten them or incite violence. It is scheduled to take effect Oct. 1, 2027.
You watch, EVERY image that is posted will claim a threat of violence, even if it doesn't do anything
but show fraud. Because showing a Democrat committing fraud IS violence to the left.
You watch, EVERY image that is posted will claim a threat of violence, even if it doesn't do anything
but show fraud. Because showing a Democrat committing fraud IS violence to the left.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
trollslayer · 51-55, M
@DogMan see sunshine’s post above. Innocent people have had their lives ruined, or even killed. Fraud is determined by law enforcement and courts. Not random bloggers and influencers.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
DogMan · 61-69, M
It amazes me that people like our friend Sunshine believe there is nothing to this fraud thing.
Billions of dollars is apparently petty cash to some. Troll slayer thinks going after fraud
is bullying. 😯 WTF? I guess we should be nice to criminals and leave them alone.
Minnesota was losing billions to fraud, then telling the working people that they needed
to raise their property taxes because they didn't have enough money. This is why Walz
can't run for another term. He was told about the fraud, and like Gavin Newsom, he
protected it.
Billions of dollars is apparently petty cash to some. Troll slayer thinks going after fraud
is bullying. 😯 WTF? I guess we should be nice to criminals and leave them alone.
Minnesota was losing billions to fraud, then telling the working people that they needed
to raise their property taxes because they didn't have enough money. This is why Walz
can't run for another term. He was told about the fraud, and like Gavin Newsom, he
protected it.








