Why do we need more Racism?

For all intents and purposes Racism is more or less over. I believe what little is left, will always
be around, and isn't a big deal. How do I know this? Well, it's easy to see that racism is such
a minor thing now, that is needs to be fabricated. We have all seen the fabricated stories similar
to the Jussie Smollett incident.

And now we find out that the very people that receive donations to fight against racism, are using that money
to create more racism. The SPLC has been indicted over this. They know racism is over, so they pay for
it to continue.

The Race baiting business NEEDS racism more than anyone. If racism goes away, they are
out of business, so according to them, we NEED MORE racism to keep the dollars coming in.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

SunshineGirl · 36-40, F

And now we find out that the very people that receive donations to fight against racism, are using that money to create more racism.

As you are so certain of this, and the organisation you are referring to is supported by private donations rather than public money, don't you think it would be better for the market to decide rather than wasting taxpayers' dollars on a prosecution no one asked for?

DogMan · 61-69, M

@SunshineGirl Soooo, do you approve of people increasing racism? Do you think it is ok to fund
the KKK in order to increase racial divide? Doesn't this make the SPLC a hate group? Why are
they tax exempt? Should we make all hate groups tax exempt?

Waveney · M

@DogMan LOL no one here said it’s okay to increase racism or fund hate groups like the KKK. That’s a strawman you just invented.

You’re also pretending the SPLC is equivalent to the KKK, which is an insane false equivalence. One is a civil rights organization; the other is literally built on racial hatred and violence. If you’re claiming the SPLC is ‘increasing racism,’ then show actual evidence. Otherwise you’re just making accusations and hoping no one notices there’s nothing behind them. @SunshineGirl

DogMan · 61-69, M

@Waveney If a right wing group was funding the KKK, you would be saying the exact opposite.

You would be saying "This has to stop!" and "Take away their tax exempt status, they are a hate group"

Don't pretend you wouldn't. Stop protecting racism and race baiters. It makes you look foolish.

Waveney · M

@DogMan If a right wing group was funding the KKK I would indeed say "this has to stop". But then I would check for evidence that it was true. So far, you have provided no evidence that the SPLC is "funding racism".

So prove it.

SunshineGirl · 36-40, F

@DogMan If anybody seriously believed (and had evidence) that the SPLC was "funding racism", I think the DoJ would be be pursuing a rather more vigorous criminal case than a suit that looks cynically designed to drain the financial resources of the defendant and which is only likely to succeed on a technicality.