DogMan · 61-69, M
Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger has warned that the website can no longer be trusted — insisting it is now just “propaganda” for the left-leaning “establishment.”
Sanger told UnHerd’s Lockdown TV Wednesday that he started the “encyclopedia of opinion” in 2001 purely on the basis it would offer true neutrality and offer “multiple points of view” on “hot button issues.”
Now, he insisted, conservative voices are “sternly warned if not kicked out” if they try to add a different take on establishment views — which Sanger deemed “propaganda.”
And it’s not just politics, he said, noting that the site only reflects “establishment mouthpieces” like Dr. Anthony Fauci as well as government health groups in its coverage of COVID-19.
“There’s a lot of Nobel prize winners and distinguished doctors whose views are not only not welcome on Wikipedia — they’re literally censored on YouTube and sometimes Facebook and Twitter because they contradict the narrative,” he said.
“There’s a global enforcement of a certain point of view on issues like COVID,” he insisted, calling it “amazing to me as a libertarian, or a liberty-loving conservative.”
Sanger told UnHerd’s Lockdown TV Wednesday that he started the “encyclopedia of opinion” in 2001 purely on the basis it would offer true neutrality and offer “multiple points of view” on “hot button issues.”
Now, he insisted, conservative voices are “sternly warned if not kicked out” if they try to add a different take on establishment views — which Sanger deemed “propaganda.”
And it’s not just politics, he said, noting that the site only reflects “establishment mouthpieces” like Dr. Anthony Fauci as well as government health groups in its coverage of COVID-19.
“There’s a lot of Nobel prize winners and distinguished doctors whose views are not only not welcome on Wikipedia — they’re literally censored on YouTube and sometimes Facebook and Twitter because they contradict the narrative,” he said.
“There’s a global enforcement of a certain point of view on issues like COVID,” he insisted, calling it “amazing to me as a libertarian, or a liberty-loving conservative.”
DogMan · 61-69, M
I'm sure our left wing friends will say it is fair and balanced, same as Twitter back when they censored anything
not approved by the DNC.
X is fair and balanced, and lets EVERYONE speak. But to the left, if it is not biased toward the left, it is
extreme right wing.
not approved by the DNC.
X is fair and balanced, and lets EVERYONE speak. But to the left, if it is not biased toward the left, it is
extreme right wing.
trollslayer · 46-50, M
4 year old article?
View 2 more replies »
DogMan · 61-69, M
@trollslayer It means many different things these days. Just like the meaning of Woman.
DogMan · 61-69, M
@trollslayer Wokeness has morphed into Political Correctness on steroids.
DogMan · 61-69, M
@trollslayer
trollslayer · 46-50, M
@DogMan do you know what “woke” means?
OK, I answered you, now answer me.
Do you know what a woman is? One of our woke SCOTUS hires does not.
trollslayer · 46-50, M
@DogMan do you know what “woke” means?
OK, I answered you, now answer me.
Do you know what a woman is? One of our woke SCOTUS hires does not.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
DogMan · 61-69, M
@TheOneyouwerewarnedabout I read about a guy that saw the Wiki answer about how Trump put immigrants in cages.
He went in and did his own edit saying the cages were built under the Obama admin. The next day that part was removed.
Truth be damned.
He went in and did his own edit saying the cages were built under the Obama admin. The next day that part was removed.
Truth be damned.



