Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Why do people say Nordic countries are Socialist?

The Nordic Model is Not A Socialist Model, It is Capitalist
Freedom Preetham
Freedom Preetham

Follow
9 min read
·
Jan 6, 2024
1.4K


40



The Nordic countries — Sweden, Norway, Denmark, and Finland — are frequently cited in discussions on socialism, but this representation is a significant misinterpretation of their actual economic and social systems. This extensive exploration aims to dissect the Nordic model in-depth, revealing its capitalist core, sophisticated use of tax revenues, and the nuanced reasons behind its common mislabeling as socialism.

Repeatedly, the leaders of Nordic nations have declared their commitment to capitalism and a free-market economy, distancing themselves from socialism. Despite these clear statements, there continues to be a recurring trend where individuals incorrectly label these countries as examples of socialist models. This persistent mislabeling overlooks the explicit economic stances these countries have taken, leading to a distorted understanding of their actual economic systems.

[b][The best you can do is call it a Social Democracy based on Capitalism./b]
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
SunshineGirl · 36-40, F
The political and economic structures of each of those countries are quite distinctive, so it does not make much sense to treat them as a homogenous entity.

I'll cut to the chase, as I anticipate what you really want to talk about. Norway, by some measures the richest and "happiest" nation state in the world, developed a state-directed model of capitalism to develop and exploit its share of North Sea mineral wealth from the 1960s onwards. It eschewed the unbridled pursuit of profit for future investment and wealth sharing. Today it has the largest sovereign wealth fund in the world and one of the most equal, egalitarian, and meritocratic societies.

The United Kingdom, which shared in the same source of that wealth, opted for a more liberal economic model in which private corporations received and kept most of the profit. Higher tax revenues from oil and gas were generally used to fund income tax breaks rather than invested by the state for the future. As a result the UK does not have a huge sovereign wealth fund and has a rather more unequal society than Norway, which is correlated to worse health outcomes and measures of social harmony.