When WW3 happens, will women get drafted?

@Northwest Well, they tell us they want equality. Have you heard something different?

@DogMan
Your ability to miss your OWN point is unparalleled.

Your claim:


But, seeing that you don't your end point, I will re-spell it out for you:

What makes you such an expert on feminism and what women want, and I will add: when it comes to this issue, because feminists definitely want equality.

On second thought, you can forget all that, because I'm sure this is something you picked up from one of your AM radio binges.

@Northwest 🤣 The point that you missed is that they want equality only in some areas.

They want equal pay across the board, but they are not seeking high paying jobs
that men do. Would you like a list of those jobs? I don't like to waste my time.
so you will have to ask me nicely. 😉

@DogMan
They do not want equality in some areas, they want equality period, and that's the point in your argument that you continue to miss, but that's typical. Here's a hint: women have active combat roles in several countries, including Israel, Jordan and the USA. All three battle tested.

@NoThanksLeon And here comes Mr. passive aggressive. You should worry about your own defeats.

@Northwest I really don't care for Fox News. I watch Haystack, which is ALL the news.

To your point, yes, there are women in combat. I worked with women in my Combat Unit.

They are a special breed. But that was not the question. And the simple fact that MEN
do 99.9% of the hard, and dangerous jobs, obviously eludes you.

Here is a basic list of high paying, family supporting jobs, that women do not want.

1. Sewer worker
2. Plumber
3. Oil rig worker
4. Carpenter
5. Truck driver
6. Logger

You know as well as I, that this list could go on and on. Women are approx. 50 %
of the population. Why are they not 50 % of the hard, dangerous, filthy jobs?

It's not because of discrimination, it is because 99.9% of them DO NOT WANT
those family supporting jobs. They would rather have a low paying receptionist
job, or something similar.

@DogMan And you continue to miss the point.

Roughly 40% of those who join the military never get deployed to a combat zone at all. 10% to 20% of those who do find themselves on a deployment wind up in a combat zone. Remember, that is not 10 to 20% of the total. It is just 10 to 20% of the 60% who get deployed.

This means that only 6% to 12% of the active military end up in a combat zone.

The US population is 235M, out of those 85M are military age. Only 3%-3.5% of the population chooses the military, this translates into 0.3% or so of the population chooses a combat role.

So, why would you single feminists out, because some of them do not choose a combat role.

Are you starting to get the point now?

Perhaps you don't care for Fox, but if it quacks like a duck, and waddles like a duck...

@Northwest So you are not able to actually respond to my post about women not wanting
the dangerous, filthy jobs that are out there. I understand, it's easier to move the
goal posts. You might want to recheck your figures. Last I checked there were around
330 million people in the U.S. It's OK, you are only off by 100 million, thats close. 🙄

@DogMan
One more, you don't get the point of your own post.

So, I will try one more time: It's not that "feminists" do not want some jobs, it's that "some" feminists do not want some jobs. For the same reasons that some men do not want these jobs.

Regrading the 335M, that was a typo, typed 2 instead of 3, but that showed how much attention you're paying (or your IQ). The stats I produced, add up to a total of 330M. You can reverse through the math, right? 🤣