In your opinion, are civilians still non combatants if they attack soldiers with bricks or petrol bombs?

@Ozymandiaz on what grounds?

@guerrilla On the grounds that they are not trained or equipped military personnel. Based on your rationale the government in Iran should just go in and wipe out all those women protesting about women's rights. Or the US government should have sent the tanks in to kill all those people rioting after George Floyd. I mean they could then be classed as enemy combatants couldn't they?

@Ozymandiaz I’m talking a little people who hurl fire bombs at soldiers.

Can I douse you in gas, light it and not expect you to resist?

@guerrilla Hazards of the job. If you have no self control then it is the wrong job for you.

@Ozymandiaz Throw a brick at me, and I’ll shoot you in the fucking face.

@guerrilla Yeah then the job probably isnt for you.

It needs real men with self discipline and not fragile egos.

@Ozymandiaz Pity, shooting you in the face sounds fun

@guerrilla I bet it does because you sound mentally fragile

@Ozymandiaz Because I disagree with you?

@guerrilla No because you talk like a child and tell people shooting them in the face sounds like fun. It's not exactly adult talk. It is the talk of an emotionally and mentally immature kid that has no business doing real men's work.

@Ozymandiaz Here’s the correct answer.

Anyone who intends to do physical harm to another individual is a combatant.

@guerrilla It is the correct answer if you are a child and not a real man that cannot abide by the warrior's code.

@Ozymandiaz A warriors code is standing still while people beat you with bricks?

That’s the cucks code.

@guerrilla Cuck is internet tough guy code 😂