" 'Britain will 'cease to exist' if World War Three happens, says Russian general"

@helenS They are exactly like Nazis

@DIABLISS So let's make sure they will end like the Nazis did. I'm against death penalty – but these butchers should not live.

@helenS i agree completely. what do you think America should do?

@DIABLISS obviously impose themself on another country and brag about the size of there dick like they allways do pretend they are better lol hey tell me somthing the only country in history to use a nuclear weapon in anger ? Who was it ?

@DIABLISS America should support Ukraine with any heavy armament they need to win this war. That's more important than anything else, at the moment, considering the fact that Europeans are cowards and traitors. They just sit and wait until Ukraine is destroyed, and then those "peace-loving" Europeans will do business as usual, with their Russian friends.

@helenS i agree

@Whyme hmmm...lemme think...🤔

@BlueVeins is it wrong ? Has any other country ever used one in anger?

@BlueVeins lol you talk as though massive civilian life wasnt taken pearl harbor attacked millitary the nukes vaporized yes vaporized civilians and you feel warm n cozy about it lol

@Whyme I ain't sayin' it was warm and cozy, just that it was very likely the least deadly option available at the time. I mean in the invasion of Okinawa, up to 50% of the civilian populace is believed to have died, mostly by suicide, and the Japanese gov't was preparing to orchestrate a similarly horrific mass-suicide in the event of an invasion. The two atomic bombs combined killed "only" about 200,000 people, and the conventional raids killed somewhere from 240,000 to 900,000. I'm by no means a defender of US foreign policy broadly, but the way we handled Japan at war's end was actually pretty reasonable.

@BlueVeins justify being the only country to nuke someone however you like i guess fact remains the only country to use one is the good ol u.s of a maybe concider that before saying putin is a monster for saying he has them you have actually used them

@Whyme We're not saying that he's a monster for [i]having them[/i], we're saying he's a monster for threatening to use them unprovoked just to gain a strategic advantage in a war that he started.

@BlueVeins again he hasnt actually used it you have

@BlueVeins i always thought he was a monster

@BlueVeins were the us monsters for the gulf war ? Or is it just other countries that are monsters ?

@Whyme K so why are you trying to distill geopolitics of all things down to one simple, cherry-picked binary? This seems like the kind of brain-dead argument a bootlicker would make to defend a fascist regime when all the facts are against them.

@Whyme [quote]were the us monsters for the gulf war ? Or is it just other countries that are monsters ?[/quote]

If you're looking for an example of something monstrous the US did, I'd go with the invasion of Iraq in 2002 or the Indochina Wars. I honestly don't know enough about the Gulf War to say for sure, the extent to which the US was justified there.

@BlueVeins my point is are every culture that arent yours monsters and should confirm to your ways ? Fact states used a nuke nobody else had what about the mid east they have weapons of mass destruction lie how about that what makes that different than russia and ukraine ?

@BlueVeins as an American...i think the most monstrous thing Americans ever did was the civil war....civil war by definition is the most disgraceful act in war history. and everyone should stop bringing up Pearl harbor and the two atomic bombs. We didn't want that war...we were bombed into it. and every bomb sent is done in anger. i am just saying

@Whyme [quote]my point is are every culture that arent yours monsters and should confirm to your ways [/quote]

K babe but I didn't state the contrary, you're arguing with yourself if that's the point you're making.

[quote]Fact states used a nuke nobody else had what about the mid east they have weapons of mass destruction lie how about that what makes that different than russia and ukraine ?[/quote]

Not 100% sure what you're saying bc this sentence is borderline incoherent, but I could rattle off several reasons. For one thing, the Iraqi gov't pre-invasion was a fascist dictatorship, whereas Ukraine is a relatively liberal democracy. Iraq was guilty of genocide against the Kurdish people, whereas Ukraine didn't commit any acts of genocide. Iraq had recently invaded Kuwait unprovoked, whereas Ukraine has never invaded anyone. Iraq had expelled IAEA inspectors from its borders before the invasion, whereas Ukraine did not. Iraq is also a much smaller country, so casualties are likely to be much lower, all else equal.

None of this is to downplay the horrors of the Iraq War; it was a clear war crime committed by the United States and an incredible tactical blunder, by the by. But Ukraine & Iraq really isn't an apt comparison.

@BlueVeins putin knows full well he cant win a world war and i cant blame him for using any intimidation available so would you and everyone on this post

@Whyme Yes, I absolutely blame him for it; it was his own damn choice to start a war, he doesn't get to use its futility to excuse his bad behavior.

@BlueVeins you dont know what motivated it you werent there you assume it was unprovoked cause the news said so but you dont know

@Whyme Nobody knows for certain, what depraved shit goes on in Putin's hollowed out husk of a brain...



but we be [i]reasonably sure[/i] in this case, comrade.