Nuclear bomb
Anyone else obsessed with their beauty to both destroy but also their structure once went off and made contact with land? 馃槏馃槏 so beautiful! (But deadly)!
41-45, F
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies 禄
Bellatrix2083 路 F
We'd be better off without them. They serve no useful purpose, although it has been argued that their mere existence preserved the peace in Europe for over 40 years, but even that perceived benefit has recently been discredited, because of the war in Yugoslavia during the 1990's and the current war in the Ukraine.
Elessar 路 26-30, M
@Bellatrix2083 I fear that there'd have been far more conflicts than those two without them. No way that the cold war would've stayed cold, for instance.
Neither Yugoslavia not Ukraine did/do have nukes. Thus far, there hasn't been any war between two or more countries with a nuclear arsenal
Neither Yugoslavia not Ukraine did/do have nukes. Thus far, there hasn't been any war between two or more countries with a nuclear arsenal