Should Similar Worlds take its cue from Facebook with regards to intentional misinformation?

I speak specifically with regards to COVID-19. I do not care if others choose to support the lie that the election was rigged. That is a political debate, not a health hazard. However, there are those who choose to perpetuate lies that will allow COVID-19 to proliferate and mutate in the bodies of the gullible for years to come, should they follow the advice of certain users. Does that not constitute a risk to the lives of the general public? I consider it to be even worse than shouting "Fire!" in a crowded theater.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

IHateViolence · 36-40, M

Who decides what is misinformation or not? The Pfizer company and Governments who have a lot of monetary interest as their main goal?

CorvusBlackthorne · M

@IHateViolence I suppose you have no evidence whatsoever that they are influencing Facebook and Twitter, apart from your own opinion, yet you will somehow conclude that I am the stupid one.

This comment is hidden. Show Comment

stratosranger · M

@IHateViolence Pfizer refused to reveal their preliminary findings before releasing the Covid19 “vaccine.” It took a freedom of information act and two years before it was finally revealed that the vaccine has over 1200 different side effects. So who’s engaging in disinformation here? 🤔