Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Why are kings and queens idealized when in fact

It's probably the worst form of government as the people have no say in anything, stability is temporary at best, everything is owned by the ruling elites, justice is unlikely, and peaceful, competent succession is not assured.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
FreddieUK · 70-79, M
Constitutional monarchies, such as the ones in Europe have no political power, but they hold back certain powers that an autocrat might try to exercise. If a truly autocratic leader tried to take control in Britain, the parliamentary system would be the first hurdle (but we see how the emasculated Congress and Senate have failed in the US), but they would also need to remove what is still a popular institution in the monarchy. I am a monarchist, not a royalist and take no part in the regular obsequies that the country is prone to, and would prefer a non-political Head of State.
peterlee · M
@FreddieUK But who would you choose. Surely not one from the present crop of politicians? Or have you a benign philanthropist in mind?

William and Kate will do nicely in my lifetime.
@peterlee Since Wm III & Mary II are long gone, a prudent and realistic choice.
FreddieUK · 70-79, M
@peterlee As I said, I don't want a politician as head of state. As far as Britain is concerned, I am content with what we've got.